Cited by 1,288Survey Methodology and NonresponseBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchSurvey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment

Open access
Pinsonneault, Alain, Kraemer, Kenneth·1993·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

:Survey research is believed to be well understood and applied by management information systems (MIS) scholars. It has been applied for several years and.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.1993.11518001

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The questionnaire-based survey method enables generalizability of outcomes, allows easy replication, and facilitates simultaneous investigation of a large number of factors.

    “This study adopted the questionnaire-based survey method as it enables generalizability of outcomes, allows for easy replication, and facilitates the simultaneous investigation of a large number of factors [111].”

    From Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities (2020) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Sampling Procedures section says representative sampling permits generalization from a sample to a population. The discussion of survey analysis describes collecting and testing data on multiple variables, which supports investigating several factors together. Our copy does not establish that questionnaire surveys are easy to replicate or that they necessarily accommodate a large number of factors. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Desanctis, G. 1986. Human resources information systems: A current assessment. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 10 (1), 15-29.
  2. ----------.1984. An evaluation of data processing steering committees. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 8 (4), 257-265.
  3. ----------. 1983. An empirical assessment of the stages of DP growth. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 7 (2), 59-70.
  4. ---------. 1983. Managing application program maintenance expenditures. Communications of the ACM. 26 (10), 739-746.
  5. ----------. 1982. Organizational context and MIS structure: Some empirical evidence. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 6 (3), 55-68.
  6. ---------. 1982. The state of practice of data administration--1981. Communications of the ACM. 25 (10), 699-706.
  7. Gremillion, L.L. 1984. Organization size and information systems use: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1 (2), 4-17.
  8. Raghunathan, B., & Raghunathan, T.S. 1989. Relationship of the rank of information systems executive to the organizational roles and planning dimensions of information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems. 6 (1), 111-126.
  9. ----------. 1986b. Production and inventory management software packages related to user reactions. Production and Inventory Management. 27 (1), 75-84.
  10. ----------. 1986c. The effects of computer location on end-user satisfaction. Industrial Processing and Management. 22 (4), 345-351.
  11. ----------. 1986e. Microcomputer application diagnostic system for identification and evaluation of user satisfaction factors of purchasing software. Microprocessing and Microporogramming. 17 (4), 185-194.
  12. ----------. 1985a. Effect of system ratings on user satisfaction. Information Age. 7 (2), 98-106.
  13. ----------. 1985b. Health marketing and sales distribution software related to computer user satisfaction. Health Marketing and Consumer Behavior. 3 (1), 79-101.
  14. ----------. 1985c. Accounting and billing software and user reactions: An interactive diagnostic audit trail. Information and Management. 9 (1), 9-20.
  15. ----------. 1982. Diffusion of modern software practices: Influence of centralization and formalization. Management Science. 28 (12), 1421-1431. REFERENCES
  16. Adams, D.A., & Weiss, I.R. Organizational connectivity systems: Is the function being effectively managed? Data Base. 20 (1), 1989, 16-20.
  17. Ahituv, N., Neumann, S., & Zviran, M. Factors affecting the policy for distributing computing resources. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 13 (4), 1989, 389-401.
  18. Alloway, R.M., & Quillard, J.A. User managers' systems needs. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 7 (2), 1983, 27-41.
  19. Attewell, P. & Rule, J.B. Survey and other methodologies applied to IT impact research: experiences from a comparative study of business computing. In K.L. Kraemer (ed.), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1991, pp. 299-316.
  20. Bailyn, L. Toward the perfect workplace? Communications of the ACM. 32 (4), 1989, 460-471.
  21. Ball, L.D., Dambolena, I.G., & Hennessey, H.D. Identifying early adopters of large software systems. Data Base. 19 (1), 1988, 21-28.
  22. Baroudi, J.J. The impact of roles variables on IS personnel work attitudes and intentions. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 9 (4), 1985, 341-357.
  23. Baroudi, J.J, & Ginzberg, M.J. Impact of the technological environment on programmer analyst job outcomes. Communications of the ACM. 29 (6), 1986, 546-555.
  24. Baroudi, J.J., Olson, M.H., & Ives, B. An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM. 29 (3), 1986, 232-238.
  25. Benson, D.H. A field study of end user computing: Findings and issues. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 7 (4), 1983, 35-45.
  26. Boockholdt, J.L. Implementing security and integrity in micro-mainframe networks. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 13 (2), 1989, 135-146.
  27. ----------. Effect of cultural differences on motivation of analysts and programmers: Singapore vs. the United States. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 10 (2), 1986, 189-197.
  28. Couger, D.J., & McIntyre, S.C. Motivation norms of knowledge engineers compared to those of software engineers. Journal of Management Information Systems. 4 (3), 1988, 82-93.
  29. Danziger, J.N., & Kraemer, K.L. Computerized data-based systems and productivity among professional workers: The case of detectives. Public Administration Review. January/February, 1985, 196-209.
  30. Danziger, J.N., & Kraemer, K.L. Survey research and multiple operationalism: The URBIS project methodology. In K.L. Kraemer (ed), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1991, pp. 351-372.
  31. Desanctis, G. Human resources information systems: A current assessment. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 10 (1), 1986, 15-29.
  32. Dickson, G.W., Leitheiser, R.L., Wetherbe, J.C., & Nechis, M. Key information systems issues for the 80's. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 8 (3), 1984, 135-159.
  33. Doll, W.J., & Torkzadeh, G. A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement. Management Science. 35 (10), 1989, 1151-1171.
  34. ----------. An evaluation of data processing steering committees. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 8 (4), 1984, 257-265.
  35. ----------. An empirical assessment of the stages of DP growth. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 7 (2), 1983. 59-70.
  36. Franz, C.r., Robey, D., & Koeblitz, R.R. User response to an online information system: A field experiment. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 10 (1), 1986, 29-42.
  37. Guimaraes, T. A study of application program development techniques. Communications of the ACM. 28 (5), 1985, 494-499.
  38. Gurbaxani, V., & Mendelson, H. The use of secondary analysis in MIS research. In K.L. Kraemer (ed.), The Management Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 1991.
  39. Gutek, B.A. Using survey research in MIS research: one researcher's experience. In K.L. Kraemer (ed.), The Management Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1991, pp. 373-382.
  40. Jobber, D., Saunders, J., Gilding, B., Hooley, G., & Hatton-Smooker, J. Assessing the value of quality assurance certificate for software: an exploratory investigation. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 13 (1), 1989, 19-32.
  41. Kaiser, K.M., & Bostrom, R.P. Personality characteristics of MIS project teams: An empirical study and action- research design. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 6 (4), 1982, 43-61.
  42. Kling, R. Adapting survey methods to study the social consequences of computerization: a response to Attewell and Rule based on five survey-based studies. In K.L. Kraemer (ed.), The Management Inforamtion Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1991, pp. 337-350.
  43. Kraemer, K.L., & Dutton, W.H. Survey research in the study of management information systems. In K.L. Kraemer (ed.), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 3-58. 1991.
  44. Lee, D.M. Usage pattern and sources of assistance for personal computer users. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 10 (4), 1986, 313-327.
  45. McFarlan, W. The Information Systems Research Challenge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 1987.
  46. Newsted, P.R., Munro, M.C., & Huff, S.L. Data acquisition instruments in management information systems. In K.L. Kraemer (ed.), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 187-210. 1991.
  47. Norman, R.J., & Nunamaker, J.F. CASE productivity perceptions of software engineering professionals. Communications of the ACM. 32 (9), 1989 1102-1109.
  48. Rivard, S., & Huff, S.L. Factors of success for end user computing. Communications of the ACM. 31 (5), 1988, 552-561.
  49. Rockart, J.F., & Flannery, L.S. The management of end-used computing. Communications of the ACM. 26 (10), 1983, 776-784.
  50. Rosenberg. M. The Logic of Research Methods. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage Publications. 1968.
  51. Sauter, S.L., Gottlieb, M.S., Jones, K.C., Dodson, V.N., & Rohrer, K.M. Job and health implications of VDT use: Initial results of the Wisconsin-NIOSH study. Communications of the ACM. 26 (4), 1983, 284-294.
  52. Vitalari, N.P., Venkatesh, A., & Gronhang, K. Computing in the home: Shifts in the time allocations patterns of households. Communications of the ACM. 28 (5), 1985, 512-522.
  53. Zmud, R.W. & Boynton, A.C. Survey measures and instruments in MIS: inventory and appraisal. In K.L. Kraemer (ed.), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K.
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
1993-09
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
75-105
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W1526941025
Cited by
1,288
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 66
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations
Funders
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Keywords
survey methodology, management information systems research, survey design, data collection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review