A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity
Abstract
The paper describes the activities of venture capitalists as an orderly process involving five sequential steps. These are (1) Deal Origination: The processes by which deals enter into consideration as investment prospects, (2) Deal Screening: A delineation of key policy variables which delimit investment prospects to a manageable few for in-depth evaluation, (3) Deal Evaluation: The assessment of perceived risk and expected return on the basis of a weighting of several characteristics of the prospective venture and the decision whether or not to invest as determined by the relative levels of perceived risk and expected return, (4) Deal Structuring: The negotiation of the price of the deal, namely the equity relinquished to the investor, and the covenants which limit the risk of the investor, (5) Post-Investment Activities: The assistance to the venture in the areas of recruiting key executives, strategic planning, locating expansion financing, and orchestrating a merger, acquisition or public offering. 41 venture capitalists provided data on a total of 90 deals which had received serious consideration in their firms. The questionnaire measured the mechanism of initial contact between venture capitalist and entrepreneur, the venture's industry, the stage of financing and product development, ratings of the venture on 23 characteristics, an assessment of the potential return and perceived risk, and the decision vis-à-vis whether to invest. The modal venture represented in the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Venture capitalists determine the time and form of investment exit.
“In addition to screening, contracting, and monitoring, venture capitalists also determine the time and form of investment exit (Tyebjee and Bruno, 1984;Gorman and Sahlman, 1989).”
From The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle (1998) · cites this paper as Tyebjee and Bruno, 1984
Cited by
Sorted by citations
N. Berger, A., & F. Udell, G. (1998) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00038-7 · Cited by 3,690 · see citing works
“In addition to screening, contracting, and monitoring, venture capitalists also determine the time and form of investment exit (Tyebjee and Bruno 1984, German and Sahlman 1989).”
The sandwich game: Founder-CEOs and forecasting as impression management
Collewaert, V., Vanacker, T., Anseel, F., & Bourgois, D. (2021) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106075 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tyebjee, T. T., & Bruno, A. V.
- Affiliations
- Santa Clara University (US)
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1984-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1051-1066
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2104697321
- Cited by
- 1,058
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 22.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
- Keywords
- venture capital, investment decision-making, deal evaluation, deal structuring, risk perception, expected returns, deal characteristics, market attractiveness, product differentiation, management skills, startups, electronics industry, cross-referral, factor analysis, discriminant analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review