The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparative Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Translog Methods: An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production
Abstract
This paper compares inferences about hospital cost and production correspondences from two different estimation models: (1) the econometric modeling of the translog cost function, and (2) the application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). While there are numerous examples of the application of each approach to empirical data, this paper provides insights into the relative strengths of the estimation methods by applying both models to the same data. The translog results suggest that constant reruns are operant, whereas the DEA results suggest that both increasing and decreasing returns to scale may be observed in different segments of the production correspondence, in turn suggesting that the translog model may be ‘averaging’ diametrically opposite behavior. On the other hand, by examining the rate of output transformation, both models agree that patient days devoted to care of children are more resource intensive than those devoted to adults or to the elderly. In addition, we compare estimates of technical efficiencies of individual hospitals obtained from the two methods. The DEA estimates are found to be highly related to the capacity utilization, but no such relationship was found for the translog estimates. This comparative application of different estimation models to the same data to obtain inferences about the nature of underlying cost and production correspondences sheds interesting light on the strengths of each approach, and suggests the need for additional research comparing estimation models using real as well as simulated data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions
Greene, W. H. (1980) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(80)90041-x · Cited by 704
Cited by
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8 · Cited by 2,061
Seiford, L. M., & Thrall, R. M. (1990) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-u · Cited by 1,921
Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs
Banker, R. D., & Morey, R. C. (1986) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.34.4.513 · Cited by 1,243
Self-citationCoordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2010 · Cited by 502
Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis
Wong, Y.-H. B., & Beasley, J. E. (1990) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1990.120 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Banker, R. D., Conrad, R. F., & Strauss, R. P.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-44
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2127834332
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Translog Methods: An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.32.1.30
- The paper
- Banker, R. D., Conrad, R. F., & Strauss, R. P. (1986). A Comparative Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Translog Methods: An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.1.30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.