Cited by 780Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesOrganizational Management and LeadershipManagement and Organizational Practices

Chief Executive Personality and Corporate Strategy and Structure in Small Firms

Miller, Danny, Toulouse, Jean-Marie·1986·Management Science

Abstract

An empirical investigation of 97 firms was conducted to determine the relationships that three aspects of the chief executive's (CEO's) personality have with the strategies, structures, decision making methods and performance of their firms. CEO flexibility was associated with niche strategies, simple, informal structures, and intuitive, risk-embracing decision making. CEO need for achievement was related to broadly focussed, marketing-oriented strategies, formal and sophisticated structures, and proactive, analytical decision making. Executives with an internal locus of control pursued more product innovation, were more future oriented, and tailored their approaches to the circumstances facing their firms. The relationships between personality and organizational characteristics were found to be by far the strongest in small firms and also somewhat more significant in dynamic environments. Flexibility and locus of control related to corporate performance under certain conditions; need for achievement did not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1389

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The strategies are not conceived by owner-managers as structural, for example as configurations of products and services, or segmentation of customers relative to competitors.

    “They are not conceived by the owner-managers as structural, for example as might be configurations of products and services, or segmentation of customers relative to competitors (d'Amboise and Muldowney, 1988;Gartner, 1985;Miller and Toulouse, 1986;Storey, 1994).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 780

Authors
Miller, D., & Toulouse, J.-M.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • HEC Montréal (CA)
Venue
Management Science
Published
1986-11
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
1389-1409
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
OpenAlex
W2117608563
Cited by
780
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 53
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Management Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
Keywords
need for achievement, locus of control, business strategy, organizational structure, decision-making, small business, firm performance, niche strategy, product innovation, dynamic environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review