The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Product Variety and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from the International Automotive Assembly Plant Study
Abstract
This paper examines the effect of product variety on manufacturing performance, defined here as total labor productivity and consumer-perceived product quality. Using data from the International Motor Vehicle Program (M.I.T.) study of 70 assembly plants worldwide, the paper examines three dimensions of product variety, at fundamental, peripheral, and intermediate levels. The international sample reveals great variation in the distribution of each type of product variety in different regions, reflecting in part different strategies for variety. Furthermore, the impact of different kinds of product variety on performance varies, and is generally much less than the conventional manufacturing wisdom would predict. However, an intermediate type of product variety, here called parts complexity, was found to have a persistent negative impact on productivity. Finally, the study provides partial support for the hypothesis that management policies, in both operations and human resource areas, can facilitate the absorption of higher levels of product variety, i.e. that “lean production” plants are capable of handling higher levels of product variety with less adverse effect on total labor productivity than traditional “mass production” plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(05)80064-3 · Cited by 6,455
Product development performance: strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1591 · Cited by 2,389
Macduffie, J. P. (1995) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979399504800201 · Cited by 1,809
Self-citationSkinner, W. (1974) · Harvard business review · Cited by 1,129
Competing against time: how time-based competition is reshaping global markets
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6424 · Cited by 888
Japanese manufacturing techniques
(1983) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(83)90111-8 · Cited by 782
Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge
Salvatore, D., Dertouzos, M. L., Lester, R. K., & Solow, R. M. (1990) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1059919 · Cited by 765
Economies of Scale in Multi-Output Production
Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1977) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1885979 · Cited by 579
Broader Product Line: A Necessity to Achieve Success?
Kekre, S., & Srinivasan, K. (1990) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.10.1216 · Cited by 550
Flexibility: The next competitive battle the manufacturing futures survey
De Meyer, A., Nakane, J., Miller, J. G., & Ferdows, K. (1989) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250100204 · Cited by 429
Cited by
Inventory Record Inaccuracy: An Empirical Analysis
DeHoratius, N., & Raman, A. (2008) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0789 · Cited by 432
An empirical study for implementation of lean principles in Indian manufacturing industry
Jasti, N. V. K., & Kodali, R. (2016) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-11-2013-0101 · Cited by 84
Nawanir, G., Lim, K. T., & Othman, S. N. (2016) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-06-2014-0013 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDuffie, J. P., Sethuraman, K., & Fisher, M. L.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 350-369
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2122501614
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 34.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Product Variety and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from the International Automotive Assembly Plant Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.42.3.350
- The paper
- MacDuffie, J. P., Sethuraman, K., & Fisher, M. L. (1996). Product Variety and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from the International Automotive Assembly Plant Study. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.3.350
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.