The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance
Abstract
Environmental management has the potential to play a pivotal role in the financial performance of the firm. Many individuals suggest that profitability is hurt by the higher production costs of environmental management initiatives, while others cite anecdotal evidence of increased profitability. A theoretical model is proposed that links strong environmental management to improved perceived future financial performance, as measured by stock market performance. The linkage to firm performance is tested empirically using financial event methodology and archival data of firm-level environmental and financial performance. Significant positive returns were measured for strong environmental management as indicated by environmental performance awards, and significant negative returns were measured for weak environmental management as indicated by environmental crises. The implicit financial market valuation of these events also was estimated. Cross-sectional analysis of the environmental award events revealed differences for first-time awards and between industries. First-time award announcements were associated with greater increases in market valuation, although smaller increases were observed for firms in environmentally dirty industries, possibly indicative of market skepticism. This linkage between environmental management and financial performance can be used by both researchers and practitioners as one measure of the benefits experienced by industry leaders, and as one criterion against which to measure investment alternatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance
Boehmer, E. (1991) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(91)90032-f · Cited by 1,775
Valuation effects of security offerings and the issuance process
Mikkelson, W. H., & Partch, M. M. (1986) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(86)90049-8 · Cited by 1,213
Cited by
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556659 · Cited by 5,130
Flammer, C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3125518 · Cited by 2,901
Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?
Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570510613956 · Cited by 2,453
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
Flammer, C. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038 · Cited by 1,949
Metadata
- Authors
- Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1199-1214
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2034009401
- Cited by
- 2,725
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.