The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems
Open accessAbstract
In models of decision making under uncertainty we often are faced with the problem of representing the uncertainties in a form suitable for quantitative models. If the uncertainties are expressed in terms of multivariate continuous distributions, or a discrete distribution with far too many outcomes, we normally face two possibilities: either creating a decision model with internal sampling, or trying to find a simple discrete approximation of the given distribution that serves as input to the model. This paper presents a method based on nonlinear programming that can be used to generate a limited number of discrete outcomes that satisfy specified statistical properties. Users are free to specify any statistical properties they find relevant, and the method can handle inconsistencies in the specifications. The basic idea is to minimize some measure of distance between the statistical properties of the generated outcomes and the specified properties. We illustrate the method by single- and multiple-period problems. The results are encouraging in that a limited number of generated outcomes indeed have statistical properties that are close to or equal to the specifications. We discuss how to verify that the relevant statistical properties are captured in these specifications, and argue that what are the relevant properties, will be problem dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A methodology to generate statistically dependent wind speed scenarios
Morales, J. M., Mínguez, R., & Conejo, A. J. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.022 · Cited by 342
Collins, S., Deane, J. P., Poncelet, K., Panos, E., Pietzcker, R. C., Delarue, E., & Ó Gallachóir, B. P. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.090 · Cited by 282
Evangelopoulos, V. A., Avramidis, I. I., & Georgilakis, P. S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2975663 · Cited by 65
A global parallel model based design of experiments method to minimize model output uncertainty
Bazil, J. N., Buzzard, G. T., & Rundell, A. E. (2012) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s11538-011-9686-9 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Høyland, K., & Wallace, S. W.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-307
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2072991174
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.295.9834
- The paper
- Høyland, K., & Wallace, S. W. (2001). Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.295.9834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.