The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust Portfolio Selection Problems
Abstract
In this paper we show how to formulate and solve robust portfolio selection problems. The objective of these robust formulations is to systematically combat the sensitivity of the optimal portfolio to statistical and modeling errors in the estimates of the relevant market parameters. We introduce “uncertainty structures” for the market parameters and show that the robust portfolio selection problems corresponding to these uncertainty structures can be reformulated as secondorder cone programs and, therefore, the computational effort required to solve them is comparable to that required for solving convex quadratic programs. Moreover, we show that these uncertainty structures correspond to confidence regions associated with the statistical procedures employed to estimate the market parameters. Finally, we demonstrate a simple recipe for efficiently computing robust portfolios given raw market data and a desired level of confidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*
Sharpe, W. F. (1964) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x · Cited by 19,441
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Schafer, J. L. (1997) · doi:10.1201/9781439821862 · Cited by 6,012
Cited by
Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/ N Portfolio Strategy?
DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm075 · Cited by 3,199
Disciplined Convex Programming
Grant, M., Boyd, S., & Ye, Y. (2006) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/0-387-30528-9_7 · Cited by 1,026
60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends
Kolm, P. N., Tütüncü, R., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2014) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.060 · Cited by 632
Pólik, I., & Terlaky, T. (2007) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450444614x · Cited by 499
Robust and Data-Driven Optimization: Modern Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Bertsimas, D., & Thiele, A. (2006) · Models, Methods, and Applications for Innovative Decision Making · doi:10.1287/educ.1063.0022 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldfarb, D., & Iyengar, G.
- Venue
- Mathematics of Operations Research
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-38
- ISSN
- 0364-765X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5471
- OpenAlex
- W2069099760
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust Portfolio Selection Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/moor.28.1.1.14260
- The paper
- Goldfarb, D., & Iyengar, G. (2003). Robust Portfolio Selection Problems. Mathematics of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.28.1.1.14260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.