The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Service Region Design for Urban Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems
Open accessAbstract
Emerging collaborative consumption business models have shown promise in terms of both generating business opportunities and enhancing the efficient use of resources. In the transportation domain, car-sharing models are being adopted on a mass scale in major metropolitan areas worldwide. This mode of servicized mobility bridges the resource efficiency of public transit and the flexibility of personal transportation. Beyond the significant potential to reduce car ownership, car sharing shows promise in supporting the adoption of fuel-efficient vehicles, such as electric vehicles (EVs), because of these vehicles’ special cost structure with high purchase but low operating costs. Recently, key players in the car-sharing business, such as Autolib’, car2go, and DriveNow, have begun to employ EVs in an operations model that accommodates one-way trips. On the one hand (and particularly in free-floating car sharing), the one-way model results in significant improvements in coverage of travel needs and therefore in adoption potential compared with the conventional round-trip-only model (advocated by Zipcar, for example). On the other hand, this model poses tremendous planning and operational challenges. In this work, we study the planning problem faced by service providers in designing a geographical service region in which to operate the service. This decision entails trade-offs between maximizing customer catchment by covering travel needs and controlling fleet operation costs. We develop a mathematical programming model that incorporates details of both customer adoption behavior and fleet management (including EV repositioning and charging) under imbalanced travel patterns. To address inherent planning uncertainty with regard to adoption patterns, we employ a distributionally robust optimization framework that informs robust decisions to overcome possible ambiguity (or lacking) of data. Mathematically, the problem can be approximated by a mixed integer second-order cone program, which is computationally tractable with practical scale data. Applying this approach to the case of car2go’s service with real operations data, we address a number of planning questions and suggest that there is potential for the future development of this service. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0611 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ortúzar, J. D. D., & Willumsen, L. G. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781119993308 · Cited by 1,220
Infrastructure planning for electric vehicles with battery swapping
Mak, H.-Y., Rong, Y., & Shen, Z.-J. M. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1672 · Cited by 570
Self-citation
Cited by
Sustainable Electric Vehicle Charging using Adaptive Pricing
Valogianni, K., Ketter, W., Collins, J., & Zhdanov, D. (2020) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13179 · Cited by 103
On the Values of Vehicle-to-Grid Electricity Selling in Electric Vehicle Sharing
Zhang, Y., Lu, M., & Shen, S. (2020) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2019.0855 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- He, L., Mak, H.-Y., Rong, Y., & Shen, Z.-J. M.
- Venue
- Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-327
- ISSN
- 1523-4614 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5498
- OpenAlex
- W1660348267
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Service Region Design for Urban Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/msom.2016.0611
- The paper
- He, L., Mak, H.-Y., Rong, Y., & Shen, Z.-J. M. (2017). Service Region Design for Urban Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.