The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assortment Optimization Under Variants of the Nested Logit Model
Abstract
We study a class of assortment optimization problems where customers choose among the offered products according to the nested logit model. There is a fixed revenue associated with each product. The objective is to find an assortment of products to offer so as to maximize the expected revenue per customer. We show that the problem is polynomially solvable when the nest dissimilarity parameters of the choice model are less than one and the customers always make a purchase within the selected nest. Relaxing either of these assumptions renders the problem NP-hard. To deal with the NP-hard cases, we develop parsimonious collections of candidate assortments with worst-case performance guarantees. We also formulate a convex program whose optimal objective value is an upper bound on the optimal expected revenue. Thus, we can compare the expected revenue provided by an assortment with the upper bound on the optimal expected revenue to get a feel for the optimality gap of the assortment. By using this approach, our computational experiments test the performance of the parsimonious collections of candidate assortments that we develop.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis.
Luce, R. D. (2005) · doi:10.1037/14396-000 · Cited by 1,157
Cited by
Deep Choice Model Using Pointer Networks for Airline Itinerary Prediction
Mottini, A., & Acuna-Agost, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098005 · Cited by 37
Allouah, A., Besbes, O., Figueroa, J., Kanoria, Y., & Kumar, A. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5381574 · Cited by 8
Allouah, A., Besbes, O., Figueroa, J. D., Kanoria, Y., & Kumar, A. (2025) · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, J. M., Gallego, G., & Topaloglu, H.
- Venue
- Operations Research
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-273
- ISSN
- 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5463
- OpenAlex
- W2105562458
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 48.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.