The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating Influence Diagrams
Abstract
An influence diagram is a graphical structure for modeling uncertain variables and decisions and explicitly revealing probabilistic dependence and the flow of information. It is an intuitive framework in which to formulate problems as perceived by decision makers and to incorporate the knowledge of experts. At the same time, it is a precise description of information that can be stored and manipulated by a computer. We develop an algorithm that can evaluate any well-formed influence diagram and determine the optimal policy for its decisions. Since the diagram can be analyzed directly, there is no need to construct other representations such as a decision tree. As a result, the analysis can be performed using the decision maker's perspective on the problem. Questions of sensitivity and the value of information are natural and easily posed. Modifications to the model suggested by such analyses can be made directly to the problem formulation, and then evaluated directly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bellman, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835386 · Cited by 14,588
Combinatorial optimization: networks and matroids
Lawler, E. L. (2021) · Cited by 3,359
Development of Automated Aids for Decision Analysis
Miller, A. C., Merkhofer, I. I. I., Howard Miley, W., Matheson Ronald, A., Rice James, E., & Thomas, R. (1976) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada026379 · Cited by 74
Cited by
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Bayesian Artificial Intelligence
Korb, K. B., & Nicholson, A. E. (2003) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203491294 · Cited by 1,014
A Conceptual Framework for Adaptive Preventive Interventions
Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2004) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/b:prev.0000037641.26017.00 · Cited by 608
Sequential updating of conditional probabilities on directed graphical structures
Spiegelhalter, D. J., & Lauritzen, S. L. (1990) · Networks · doi:10.1002/net.3230200507 · Cited by 521
Probabilistic Inference and Influence Diagrams
Shachter, R. D. (1988) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.36.4.589 · Cited by 494
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shachter, R. D.
- Venue
- Operations Research
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 871-882
- ISSN
- 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5463
- OpenAlex
- W2113677269
- Cited by
- 1,250
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating Influence Diagrams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/opre.34.6.871
- The paper
- Shachter, R. D. (1986). Evaluating Influence Diagrams. Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.34.6.871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.