The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global Sensitivity Analysis
Abstract
In applications of operations research models, decision makers must assess the sensitivity of outputs to imprecise values for some of the model's parameters. Existing analytic approaches for classic optimization models rely heavily on duality properties for assessing the impact of local parameter variations, parametric programming for examining systematic variations in model coefficients, or stochastic programming for ascertaining a robust solution. This paper accommodates extensive simultaneous variations in any of an operations research model's parameters. For constrained optimization models, the paper demonstrates practical approaches for determining relative parameter sensitivity with respect to a model's optimal objective function value, decision variables, and other analytic functions of a solution. Relative sensitivity is assessed by assigning a portion of variation in an output value to each parameter that is imprecisely specified. The computing steps encompass optimization, Monte Carlo sampling, and statistical analyses, in addition to model specification. The required computations can be achieved with commercially available off-the-shelf software available for microcomputers and other platforms. The paper uses a broad set of test models to demonstrate the merit of the approaches. The results are easily put to use by a practitioner. The paper also outlines further research developments to extend the applicability of the approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., & Tarantola, S. (2010) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018 · Cited by 3,623
Shapley Effects for Global Sensitivity Analysis: Theory and Computation
Song, E., Nelson, B. L., & Staum, J. (2016) · SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification · doi:10.1137/15m1048070 · Cited by 244
Ascione, F., Bianco, N., De Stasio, C., Mauro, G. M., & Vanoli, G. P. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.078 · Cited by 219
Exploratory modeling for analyzing coupled human-natural systems under uncertainty
Moallemi, E. A., Kwakkel, J., de Haan, F. J., & Bryan, B. A. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102186 · Cited by 130
Dulong, S., Ballesta, A., Okyar, A., & Lévi, F. (2015) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0129 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner, H. M.
- Venue
- Operations Research
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 948-969
- ISSN
- 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5463
- OpenAlex
- W1973546808
- Cited by
- 932
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Sensitivity Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/opre.43.6.948
- The paper
- Wagner, H. M. (1995). Global Sensitivity Analysis. Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.43.6.948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.