The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Empirical Investigation of the Microstructure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer Through Learning by Doing
Abstract
Does knowledge acquired through learning by doing on one shift transfer to a second shift when it is introduced at a manufacturing plant? The answer to this question has important theoretical implications about where knowledge is embedded in organizations and about sources of productivity growth. The answer also has important practical implications for managers planning to introduce additional facilities. This paper analyzes the amount of transfer across shifts at a manufacturing facility. Specifically, we analyze the amount of knowledge that is carried forward when the plant makes the transition from one to two shifts. We also investigate whether the rate of knowledge acquisition differs by shift, and we estimate the amount of transfer that occurs across shifts once both are in operation. In addition, we study transfer over time by analyzing whether knowledge acquired through learning by doing is cumulative and persists through time or whether it depreciates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Cited by
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Self-citationDarr, E. D., Argote, L., & Epple, D. (1995) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750 · Cited by 1,455
Self-citationA Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0280 · Cited by 606
Self-citationInformation technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research
Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C., & Rose, G. M. (2000) · Accounting, Management and Information Technologies · doi:10.1016/s0959-8022(99)00017-x · Cited by 377
Sustaining Change: Once Evidence-Based Practices Are Transferred, What Then?
Virani, T., Lemieux-Charles, L., Davis, D., & Berta, W. (2009) · Healthcare Quarterly · doi:10.12927/hcq.2009.20420 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Epple, D., Argote, L., & Murphy, K.
- Venue
- Operations Research
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-86
- ISSN
- 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5463
- OpenAlex
- W2112034264
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Empirical Investigation of the Microstructure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer Through Learning by Doing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/opre.44.1.77
- The paper
- Epple, D., Argote, L., & Murphy, K. (1996). An Empirical Investigation of the Microstructure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer Through Learning by Doing. Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.44.1.77
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.