The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”
Abstract
Stakeholder theory begins with the assumption that values are necessarily and explicitly a part of doing business. It asks managers to articulate the shared sense of the value they create, and what brings its core stakeholders together. It also pushes managers to be clear about how they want to do business, specifically what kinds of relationships they want and need to create with their stakeholders to deliver on their purpose. This paper offers a response to Sundaram and Inkpen's article “The Corporate Objective Revisited” by clarifying misconceptions about stakeholder theory and concluding that truth and freedom are best served by seeing business and ethics as connected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bird F., 1989, California Management Rev., 32, 73, 10.2307/41166735 · DOI
- Collins J. C., 2001, Good to Great
- Collins J. C., 1994, Built to Last
- Donaldson T., 1995, Acad. Management Rev., 20, 65, 10.2307/258887 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3857340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0090-5720(90)90022-Y · DOI
- 10.2307/3858020 · DOI · Paper page
- George B., 2003, Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets of Creating Lasting Value
- Hayek F. A., 1944, The Road to Serfdom
- Inkpen A., 2001, The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, 409
- 10.5465/amr.1999.1893929 · DOI · Paper page
- Jones T., 2002, The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics, 19
- McCloskey D., 1998, The Rhetoric of Economics
- Meyers Marshall W., 1994, Research in Organization Behavior, 16, 204
- 10.5840/beq200313434 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4159/9780674042605 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0068 · DOI · Paper page
- Venkataraman S., 2002, The Ruffin Series No. 3: Ethics and Entrepreneurship, 45
- Werhane P., 1998, Moral Imagination in Management Decision Making
- 10.1287/orsc.9.2.123 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research
Witt, M. A. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7 · Cited by 680
Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0121 · Cited by 614
Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Sarkis, J., & Filho, M. G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.010 · Cited by 576
Business cases for sustainability: a stakeholder theory perspective
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026617722882 · Cited by 477
Self-citationBoesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570710741028 · Cited by 415
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 364-369
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2120634978
- Cited by
- 2,275
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 73.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
