The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote Firm Innovation? A Tale of Two Emerging Economies
Abstract
Using a comparative institutional perspective, we explore whether business groups’ roles in facilitating affiliate firms’ innovation varies by country and time period. We compare the innovativeness of firms affiliated with business groups to that of independent firms in two emerging economies: South Korea and Taiwan. On average, business group affiliates outperform independent firms in South Korea, but not in Taiwan, and in the early 1990s, but not in the late 1990s. The existence of alternative institutional infrastructures for innovation might explain these differences. Groups’ abilities to share technological knowledge and financial resources among affiliates enables them to create value by promoting innovation in emerging economies, but groups’ diversification might inhibit individual affiliates’ innovativeness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. (1989) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3210 · Cited by 13,303
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
Andrews, A. O., Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393344 · Cited by 8,261
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage
Porter, P. K., Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2003) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/30040740 · Cited by 7,510
National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning
(2010) · Anthem Press eBooks · doi:10.7135/upo9781843318903 · Cited by 6,032
Cited by
Castellacci, F. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.014 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, S.-J., Chung, C.-N., & Mahmood, I. P.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 637-656
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W1968863680
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 38.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote Firm Innovation? A Tale of Two Emerging Economies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1060.0202
- The paper
- Chang, S.-J., Chung, C.-N., & Mahmood, I. P. (2006). When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote Firm Innovation? A Tale of Two Emerging Economies. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
