Cited by 369Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFirm Innovation and GrowthInnovation and Knowledge Management

Pre-Entry Knowledge, Learning, and the Survival of New Firms

Open access
Dencker, John C., Gruber, Marc, Shah, Sonali K.·2009·Organization Science

Abstract

New firms are endowed with knowledge and experience at birth through the human capital of their founder(s). Existing empirical research suggests that this pre-entry knowledge and experience will influence the firm's chances of survival; however, the mechanisms underlying this relationship have yet to be investigated. We seek to better understand and unpack this relationship. Specifically, we study the extent to which a founder's pre-entry knowledge of the business activity and pre-entry management experience influence the effectiveness of two subsequent learning activities—namely, early-stage business planning and product-line change. Our findings suggest that pre-entry knowledge and management experience increase firm survival through moderating the effects of these subsequent learning activities. We also find that learning activities are not always beneficial; in our sample, early-stage business planning is associated with decreased firm survival, and product line change is associated with increased firm survival. We examine these patterns using survey data collected from 436 individuals in the Munich region who founded their own firms as an alternative to continued unemployment. Our results have theoretical implications for the entrepreneurship, evolutionary economics, and organizational learning literatures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1080.0387

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For necessity entrepreneurs who experience a persistent lack of resources and are marginalized in business, a fixed mindset may limit the likelihood that they will possess sufficient entrepreneurial self-efficacy to try new ways of doing things.

    “Thus, for necessity entrepreneurs who experience a persistent lack of resources, and who tend to be marginalized in the world of business, a fixed mindset may limit the likelihood that they will possess sufficient entrepreneurial self-efficacy that would aid in the willingness to try new ways of doing things that can be seen as difficult or not guaranteed to work (Dencker et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dencker, J. C., Gruber, M., & Shah, S. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2009-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
516-537
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2166346994
Cited by
369
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organization Science (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
new firm survival, founder human capital, managerial experience, organizational learning, entrepreneurship, moderating effect, self-employment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review