The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities
Abstract
Before technological change leads to new processes, products, markets, or ways of organizing, entrepreneurs must discover opportunities in which to exploit the new technology. To date, research has not explained adequately why entrepreneurs discover these opportunities, which creates several conceptual problems in the entrepreneurship literature. Drawing on Austrian economics, I argue that opportunity discovery is a function of the distribution of information in society (Hayek 1945). Through in-depth case studies of eight sets of entrepreneurs who exploit a single MIT invention, I show that entrepreneurs discover opportunities related to the information that they already possess. I use these findings to draw several implications that differ from those prevailing in the entrepreneurship literature, including: (1) entrepreneurs do not always select between alternative market opportunities for new technologies; (2) the source of entrepreneurship lies in differences in information about opportunities; (3) the results of prior studies of entrepreneurial exploitation may suffer from bias; and (4) individual differences influence the opportunities that people discover, how their entrepreneurial efforts are organized, and how the government can influence this process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00029-3 · Cited by 3,047
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Aldrich H., 1993, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, 1
- Aldrich H., 1986, The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship
- 10.1016/0883-9026(87)90020-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Boeker W., 1988, Ecological Models of Organizations
- 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T · DOI · Paper page
- Brockhaus R., 1986, The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship
- 10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2392884 · DOI
- Casson M., 1982, The Entrepreneur
- 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/261629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00390028 · DOI
- Hayek F., 1945, Amer. Econom. Rev., 35, 519
- 10.1016/0883-9026(91)90005-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/260790 · DOI · Paper page
- Kirzner I., 1973, Competition and Entrepreneurship
- Kirzner I., 1985, Discovery and the Capitalist Process
- Kirzner I., 1997, J. Econom. Lit., 35, 60
- 10.1037/14359-000 · DOI · Paper page
- Miles M., 1984, Analyzing Qualitative Data: A Sourcebook for New Methods
- Nelson R., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195067040.001.0001 · DOI
- Rosenberg N., 1994, Conference on Growth and Development: The Economics of the 21st Century
- Schumpeter J., 1934, Theory of Economic Development
- Shackle G., 1982, Imagination and the Nature of Choice
- Shane S., 2000, Academy of Management Review, 25, 217
- 10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001113 · DOI
- 10.1086/258464 · DOI
- Stiglitz J., 1994, Whither Socialism?
- Stinchcombe A., 1965, Handbook of Organizations
- Venkatarman S., 1997, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth
- Von Hippel E., 1988, The Sources of Innovation
- 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429 · DOI
- Yin R., 1984, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Cited by
Entrepreneurial Action And The Role Of Uncertainty In The Theory Of The Entrepreneur
McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379628 · Cited by 3,103
A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(01)00068-4 · Cited by 2,743
Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006 · Cited by 1,567
The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history
Helfat, C. E. (2002) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/11.4.725 · Cited by 1,087
Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning
Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.003 · Cited by 1,054
Metadata
- Authors
- Shane, S.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 448-469
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2030747846
- Cited by
- 4,585
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 82.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.