Cited by 1,567Innovation and Socioeconomic DevelopmentEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesManagement and Organizational Studies

Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh

Mair, Johanna, Marti, Ignasi·2009·Journal of Business Venturing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mair, J., & Marti, I.
Affiliations
IESE Business School (ES)
Corresponding author
Mair, Johanna
Venue
Journal of Business Venturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
419-435
ISSN
0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087748205
Cited by
1,567
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 172 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 38
FWCI
52.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Venturing (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
entrepreneurship, institutional voids, rural entrepreneurship, poverty, market participation, institutional arrangements, bricolage, political economy, resource constraints, market development, Bangladesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review