Cited by 152Complex Network Analysis TechniquesBusiness Strategy and InnovationSocial Capital and Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Missing Link: The Effect of Customers on the Formation of Relationships Among Producers in the Multiplex Triads

Shipilov, Andrew V., Li, Stan Xiao·2012·Organization Science

Abstract

This paper develops a concept of a “multiplex triad,” i.e., a triplet composed of actors playing different roles and interconnected by different kinds of relationships. An example of such triad is a social structure comprising two producers connected via horizontal relationships and a customer connected to producers via vertical ties. Multiplex triads are important drivers of network evolution, but their dynamics remains poorly understood. Although conventional wisdom suggests that horizontal ties between producers are driven solely by their prior interactions, we find that vertical ties drive the formation of horizontal relationships in a multiplex triad. We also find that these triads are affected by the agency of the customers who (a) force producers into horizontal relationships with those producers that have protected the customers' interests in the past and (b) prevent closure in triads containing strong horizontal relationships because of the divergent objectives of these triads' members. By drawing attention to the existence of multiplex triads and their underlying dynamics, this paper advances a novel view on transitivity incorporating conflicting interests and agencies of actors within social systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1100.0568

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 73 references

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Dow Jones Newswires, 2003, Wall Street Journal
  2. Gimeno J., 1996, Embeddedness of Strategy: Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 323
  3. Gulati R., 2002, The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, 281
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  5. Helper S., 1992, J. Law, Econom. Organ., 8, 561
  6. Pollock T. G., 2004, Acad. Management Rev., 29, 50
  7. Rogers W., 1993, Stata Tech. Bull., 13, 19
  8. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  9. Siconolfi M., 1996, Wall Street Journal, C1
  10. Tomz M., 2003, J. Statist. Software, 8, 246

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–152 of 152

Metadata

Authors
Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X.
Affiliations
  • INSEAD (FR)
  • York University (CA)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2012-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
472-491
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2102702068
Cited by
152
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
Keywords
triadic closure, transitivity, horizontal ties, network formation, network evolution, conflicts of interest, actor agency, social networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review