The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Abstract
The dominant explanation for the spread of technological innovations emphasizes processes of influence and information flow. Firms which are closely connected to pre-existing users of an innovation learn about it and adopt it early on. Firms at the periphery of communication networks are slower to adopt. This paper develops an alternative model which emphasizes the role of know-how and organizational learning as potential barriers to adoption of innovations. Firms delay in-house adoption of complex technology until they obtain sufficient technical know-how to implement and operate it successfully. In response to knowledge barriers, new institutions come into existence which progressively lower those barriers, and make it easier for firms to adopt and use the technology without extensive in-house expertise. Service bureaus, consultants, and simplification of the technology are examples. As knowledge barriers are lowered, diffusion speeds up, and one observes a transition from an early pattern in which the new technology is typically obtained as a service to a later pattern of in-house provision of the technology. Thus the diffusion of technology is reconceptualized in terms of organizational learning, skill development, and knowledge barriers. The utility of this approach is shown through an empirical study of the diffusion of business computing in the United States, reporting survey and ethnographic data on the spread of business computing, on the learning processes and skill…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Williamson, O. E. (1975) · Cited by 6,810
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing
Arrow, K. J. (1971) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15430-2_11 · Cited by 6,626
The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach
Williamson, O. E. (1981) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/227496 · Cited by 6,460
Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392832 · Cited by 6,188
Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory
Pavitt, K. (1984) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 · Cited by 6,038
von Hippel, E. (2007) · Gabler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_10 · Cited by 5,123
The Economics of Industrial Innovation
Soete, L. L. G., & Freeman, C. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203357637 · Cited by 4,758
Patterns of Industrial Innovation
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978) · Technology Review · Cited by 3,269
Brooks, F. P. (1975) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/390016.808439 · Cited by 3,215
Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies
Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/214762.214766 · Cited by 3,005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yeoh, P., & Roth, K. (1999) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199907)20:7 · Cited by 324
The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness
Szulanski, G. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2884 · Cited by 1,789
Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094828 · Cited by 1,729
An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses
Thong, J. Y. L. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518227 · Cited by 1,727
ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS*
Wolfe, R. A. (1994) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x · Cited by 1,484
Metadata
- Authors
- Attewell, P.
- Affiliations
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Corresponding author
- Attewell, Paul
- ORCID
- Attewell, Paul
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2143465259
- Cited by
- 1,401
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 83
- FWCI
- 19.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Keywords
- technology diffusion, organizational learning, business computing, knowledge barriers, service bureaus, consultants, institutional change, skill development, communication networks, diffusion of innovations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
