The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
University of pennsylvania smell identification test: A rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic
Abstract
Despite the fact that clinical otolaryngologists are often presented with complaints of olfactory dysfunction, they have limited means to diagnose these problems. A major reason has been the lack of a clinically‐useful and reliable quantitative test of olfactory function. Recent work at our Clinical Research Center has resulted in the development of such a test. This test — the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) — can be self‐administered and uses microencapsulated odorants which are released by scratching standardized odor‐impregnated test booklets. As indicated in this paper, studies have demonstrated that the UPSIT can identify most malingerers and is sensitive to age, gender, smoking habits, and a wide variety of olfactory disorders. A description of this new test, along with some of its applications, is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Doty, R. L., Shaman, P., & Dann, M. (1984) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(84)90269-5 · Cited by 1,854
Self-citation
Cited by
Detection of Huntington's disease decades before diagnosis: the Predict-HD study
Paulsen, J. S., Langbehn, D. R., Stout, J. C., Aylward, E., Ross, C. A., Nance, M., Guttman, M., Johnson, S., MacDonald, M., Beglinger, L. J., et al. (2008) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.128728 · Cited by 804
An Odor is Not Worth a Thousand Words: From Multidimensional Odors to Unidimensional Odor Objects
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639 · Cited by 485
Oligogenic basis of isolated gonadotropin-releasing hormone deficiency
Sykiotis, G. P., Plummer, L., Hughes, V. A., Au, M., Durrani, S., Nayak-Young, S., Dwyer, A. A., Quinton, R., Hall, J. E., Gusella, J. F., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009622107 · Cited by 360
Scadding, G. K., Kariyawasam, H. H., Scadding, G., Mirakian, R., Buckley, R. J., Dixon, T., Durham, S. R., Farooque, S., Jones, N., Leech, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/cea.12953 · Cited by 359
Boesveldt, S., Postma, E. M., Boak, D., Welge-Luessen, A., Schöpf, V., Mainland, J. D., Martens, J., Ngai, J., & Duffy, V. B. (2017) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx025 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Doty, R. L., Shaman, P., Kimmelman, C. P., & Dann, M. S.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 176-178
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2020101887
- Cited by
- 878
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: University of pennsylvania smell identification test: A rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1288/00005537-198402000-00004
- The paper
- Doty, R. L., Shaman, P., Kimmelman, C. P., & Dann, M. S. (1984). University of pennsylvania smell identification test: A rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198402000-00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
