Cited by 111Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSleep and related disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of unilateral and bilateral nasal obstruction on snoring and sleep apnea

Open access
Miljeteig, Harald, Hoffstein, Victor, Cole, Philip·1992·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare apnea and snoring in patients with different patterns of nasal resistance: normal, high unilateral, and high bilateral. The authors examined 683 unselected patients referred for evaluation of snoring and possible sleep apnea. All patients had determination of nasal resistance (performed during wakefulness in the seated posture) and nocturnal polysomnography including quantitative measurement of snoring. Analysis of variance showed no significant difference in apnea and snoring indices among the three nasal resistance groups (normal, high unilateral, and high bilateral). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the frequency of patients with different severity of apnea and snoring among the three groups. It is concluded that 1. unilateral and bilateral elevation of nasal resistance may lead to equally severe snoring or apnea; 2. there is no direct relationship between awake seated nasal resistance measurement and sleep disordered breathing; and 3. measurements of supine nasal resistance during sleep may be required to elucidate the relationship between sleep‐disordered breathing and nasal obstruction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1288/00005537-199210000-00009

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zwillich C. W., 1981, Disturbed Sleep and Prolonged Apnea During Nasal Obstruction in Normal Man, Am Rev Respir Dis, 124, 158

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 111

Metadata

Authors
Miljeteig, H., Hoffstein, V., & Cole, P.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Hoffstein, Victor
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-10
Volume
102
Issue
10
Pages
1150-1152
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2106574708
Cited by
111
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
nasal obstruction, unilateral nasal obstruction, bilateral nasal obstruction, nasal resistance, snoring, sleep apnea, sleep-disordered breathing, apnea index, polysomnography
MeSH terms
Airway Resistance, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Snoring, Nasal Obstruction, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review