The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Number concentration and size of particles in urban air: effects on spirometric lung function in adult asthmatic subjects.
Open accessAbstract
Daily variations in ambient particulate air pollution are associated with variations in respiratory lung function. It has been suggested that the effects of particulate matter may be due to particles in the ultrafine (0.01-0.1 microm) size range. Because previous studies on ultrafine particles only used self-monitored peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), we assessed the associations between particle mass and number concentrations in several size ranges measured at a central site and measured (biweekly) spirometric lung function among a group of 54 adult asthmatics (n = 495 measurements). We also compared results to daily morning, afternoon, and evening PEFR measurements done at home (n = 7,672-8,110 measurements). The median (maximum) 24 hr number concentrations were 14,500/cm(3) (46,500/cm(3)) ultrafine particles and 800/cm(3) (2,800/cm(3)) accumulation mode (0.1-1 microm) particles. The median (maximum) mass concentration of PM(2.5) (particulate matter < 2.5 microm) and PM(10) (particulate matter < 10 microm in aerodynamic diameter) were 8.4 microg/m(3) (38.3 microg/m(3)) and 13.5 microg/m(3) (73.7 microg/m(3)), respectively. The number of accumulation mode particles was consistently inversely associated with PEFR in spirometry. Inverse, but nonsignificant, associations were observed with ultrafine particles, and no associations were observed with large particles (PM(10)). Compared to the effect estimates for self-monitored PEFR, the effect estimates for spirometric PEFR tended to be larger. The standard errors were also larger, probably due to the lower number of spirometric measurements. The present results support the need to monitor the particle number and size distributions in urban air in addition to mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities
Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M. E., Ferris, B. G., & Speizer, F. E. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312093292401 · Cited by 8,018
Cited by
Brunekreef, B., & Holgate, S. T. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11274-8 · Cited by 4,638
Oberdörster, G., Maynard, A., Donaldson, K., Castranova, V., Fitzpatrick, J., Ausman, K., Carter, J., Karn, B., Kreyling, W., Lai, D., et al. (2005) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-2-8 · Cited by 2,134
Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage
Li, N., Sioutas, C., Cho, A., Schmitz, D., Misra, C., Sempf, J., Wang, M., Oberley, T., Froines, J., & Nel, A. (2003) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.6000 · Cited by 2,097
The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols
Kennedy, I. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the Combustion Institute · doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.116 · Cited by 377
Gilmour, M. I., Jaakkola, M. S., London, S. J., Nel, A. E., & Rogers, C. A. (2006) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8380 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Penttinen, P., Timonen, K. L., Tiittanen, P., Mirme, A., Ruuskanen, J., & Pekkanen, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 319-323
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2060702580
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Number concentration and size of particles in urban air: effects on spirometric lung function in adult asthmatic subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.01109319
- The paper
- Penttinen, P., Timonen, K. L., Tiittanen, P., Mirme, A., Ruuskanen, J., & Pekkanen, J. (2001). Number concentration and size of particles in urban air: effects on spirometric lung function in adult asthmatic subjects. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.