The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The concentration-response relation between PM(2.5) and daily deaths.
Open accessAbstract
Particulate air pollution at commonly occurring concentrations is associated with daily deaths. Recent attention has focused on the shape of the concentration-response curve, particularly at low doses. Several recent articles have reported that particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < or = 10 microm (PM(10)) was associated with daily deaths with no evidence of a threshold. These reports have used smoothing or spline methods in individual cities and pooled the results across multiple cities to obtain estimates that are more robust. To date, fine particulate matter (aerodynamic diameter Less than or equal to 2.5 microm; PM(2.5)), a component of PM(10), has not been examined in this regard. We examined this association in a hierarchical model in six U.S. cities. In the first stage, we fit log-linear models including smooth functions of PM(2.5) in each city, controlling for season, weather, and day of the week. These smooth functions allowed for nonlinearities in the city-specific associations. We combined the estimated curves across cities using a hierarchical model that allows for heterogeneity. We found an essentially linear relationship down to 2 microg/m(3). The same approach was applied to examine the concentration response to traffic particles, controlling for particles from other sources. Once again, the association showed no sign of a threshold. The magnitude of the association suggests that controlling fine particle pollution would result in thousands of fewer early deaths per year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of ambient particulate matter and ozone on daily mortality in Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Hoek, G., Schwartz, J. D., Groot, B., & Eilers, P. (1997) · Archives of Environmental Health An International Journal · doi:10.1080/00039899709602224 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease
Rajagopalan, S., Al-Kindi, S. G., & Brook, R. D. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.099 · Cited by 1,299
Association of short-term exposure to air pollution with mortality in older adults
Di, Q., Dai, L., Wang, Y., Zanobetti, A., Choirat, C., Schwartz, J. D., & Dominici, F. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.17923 · Cited by 698
Self-citationCardiovascular effects of air pollution
Brook, R. D. (2008) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20070444 · Cited by 657
The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols
Kennedy, I. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the Combustion Institute · doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.116 · Cited by 377
A Method to Estimate the Chronic Health Impact of Air Pollutants in U.S. Residences
Logue, J. M., Price, P. N., Sherman, M. H., & Singer, B. C. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104035 · Cited by 251
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, J., Laden, F., & Zanobetti, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1025-1029
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2138536648
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The concentration-response relation between PM(2.5) and daily deaths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.021101025
- The paper
- Schwartz, J., Laden, F., & Zanobetti, A. (2002). The concentration-response relation between PM(2.5) and daily deaths. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.021101025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.