Ultrafine Particles in the Urban Air: To the Respiratory Tract--And Beyond?
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The central nervous system was proposed as another organ negatively affected by air pollutants.
“More recently, the central nervous system was proposed as another organ negatively affected by air pollutants [5]”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multiple Airborne Pollutants and Autism Spectrum Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 304
- Authors
- Oberdörster, G., & Utell, M. J.
- ORCID
- Utell, Mark J.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- a440-a441
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233533212
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- ultrafine particles, urban air pollution, respiratory tract, particulate matter, air pollution health effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
