Cited by 64Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Persistent Lipophilic Environmental Chemicals and Endometriosis: The ENDO Study

Open access
Louis, Germaine M. Buck, Chen, Zhen, Peterson, C. Matthew, Hediger, Mary L., Croughan, Mary S., Sundaram, Rajeshwari, Stanford, Joseph B., Varner, Michael W. +5 more·2012·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

Background: An equivocal literature exists regarding the relation between persistent organochlorine pollutants (POPs) and endometriosis in women, with differences attributed to methodologies. Objectives: We assessed the association between POPs and the odds of an endometriosis diagnosis and the consistency of findings by biological medium and study cohort. Methods: Using a matched cohort design, we assembled an operative cohort of women 18–44 years of age undergoing laparoscopy or laparotomy at 14 participating clinical centers from 2007 to 2009 and a population-based cohort matched on age and residence within a 50-mile catchment area of the clinical centers. Endometriosis was defined as visualized disease in the operative cohort and as diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging in the population cohort. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each POP in relation to an endometriosis diagnosis, with separate models run for each medium (omental fat in the operative cohort, serum in both cohorts) and cohort. Adjusted models included age, body mass index, breast-feeding conditional on parity, cotinine, and lipids. Results: Concentrations were higher in omental fat than in serum for all POPs. In the operative cohort, γ-hexachlorocyclohexane (γ-HCH) was the only POP with a significant positive association with endometriosis [per 1-SD increase in log-transformed γ-HCH: adjusted OR (AOR) = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.59]; β-HCH was the only significant predictor in the population cohort (per 1-SD increase in log-transformed β-HCH: AOR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.72). Conclusions: Using a matched cohort design, we found that cohort-specific and biological-medium–specific POPs were associated with endometriosis, underscoring the importance of methodological considerations when interpreting findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.1104432

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 64

Authors
Louis, G. M. B., Chen, Z., Peterson, C. M., Hediger, M. L., Croughan, M. S., Sundaram, R., Stanford, J. B., Varner, M. W., Fujimoto, V. Y., Giudice, L. C., Trumble, A., Parsons, P. J., & Kannan, K.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Louis, Germaine M. Buck
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2012-03-14
Volume
120
Issue
6
Pages
811-816
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W1981629790
Cited by
64
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Utah
  • National Institutes of Health (NO1-DK-6-3428, 10001406-02, NO1‐DK‐6‐3427)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (10001406-02)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (N01-DK-6-3427, N01-DK-6-3428)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NO1-DK-6-3427, NO1-DK-63428, 10001406-02)
  • Ethicon Endo-Surgery
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
endometriosis, persistent organic pollutants, organochlorine pesticides, lindane, beta-hexachlorocyclohexane, omental fat, environmental chemical exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Hexachlorocyclohexane, California, Endometriosis, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Humans, Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Omentum, Laparoscopy, Utah, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review