The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electron-spin resonance study of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke: nature of the free radicals in gas-phase smoke and in cigarette tar.
Open accessAbstract
Radicals in the gas phase of both mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke have been studied using electron-spin resonance ESR spin-trapping techniques with alpha-phenyl-N-tert-butyl nitrone (PBN) as the spin trap. The principal radicals we trap appear to be alkoxyl radicals. Mainstream and sidestream gas-phase smoke each have about the same concentration of radicals, about 1 X 10(16) radicals per cigarette (or 5 X 10(14) per puff). These radicals are reactive, yet they appear to be remarkably long-lived: they are still spin trapped from gas-phase smoke after more than 5 min. We propose that a steady-state concentration of reactive radicals exists in gas phase cigarette smoke. We suggest that this steady state is produced by the slow oxidation of nitric oxide (present in high concentrations in smoke and relatively unreactive) to the more reactive nitrogen dioxide, followed by the reaction of nitrogen dioxide with reactive organic molecules in smoke (such as olefins and dienes). Preliminary experiments reported here support this hypothesis. Tar from both mainstream and sidestream smoke contains persistent free radicals that exhibit broad, single-line ESR spectra with g values of 2.003. The tar radical can be extracted into tert-butylbenzene and other organic solvents, and we have applied a variety of fractionation procedures to these solutions. Most of the radicals occur in the fractions that contain the phenolic tobacco leaf pigments. Treatment of alcoholic solutions of tar with base generates a new group of radicals that appear to be semiquinone radicals derived from the oxidation of the phenolic and polyphenolic species in tar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cadenas, E., Boveris, A., Ragan, C. I., & Stoppani, A. O. M. (1977) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/0003-9861(77)90035-2 · Cited by 855
Cited by
Raza, H., John, A., & Nemmar, A. (2013) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000350087 · Cited by 47,221
Oxygen radicals and human disease
CROSS, C. E., HALLIWELL, B., BORISH, E. T., PRYOR, W. A., AMES, B. N., SAUL, R. L., McCORD, J. M., & HARMAN, D. (1987) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-526 · Cited by 1,856
Self-citationSpin Trapping: ESR parameters of spin adducts 1474 1528V
Buettner, G. R. (1987) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(87)80033-3 · Cited by 1,827
Valavanidis, A., Vlachogianni, T., & Fiotakis, K. (2009) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph6020445 · Cited by 519
Skog, K. I., Johansson, M. A. E., & Jägerstad, M. I. (1998) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(98)00061-1 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Pryor, W. A., Prier, D. G., & Church, D. F.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 345-355
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2108103389
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron-spin resonance study of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke: nature of the free radicals in gas-phase smoke and in cigarette tar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.8347345
- The paper
- Pryor, W. A., Prier, D. G., & Church, D. F. (1983). Electron-spin resonance study of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke: nature of the free radicals in gas-phase smoke and in cigarette tar. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8347345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.