The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indirect health effects of relative humidity in indoor environments.
Open accessAbstract
A review of the health effects of relative humidity in indoor environments suggests that relative humidity can affect the incidence of respiratory infections and allergies. Experimental studies on airborne-transmitted infectious bacteria and viruses have shown that the survival or infectivity of these organisms is minimized by exposure to relative humidities between 40 and 70%. Nine epidemiological studies examined the relationship between the number of respiratory infections or absenteeism and the relative humidity of the office, residence, or school. The incidence of absenteeism or respiratory infections was found to be lower among people working or living in environments with mid-range versus low or high relative humidities. The indoor size of allergenic mite and fungal populations is directly dependent upon the relative humidity. Mite populations are minimized when the relative humidity is below 50% and reach a maximum size at 80% relative humidity. Most species of fungi cannot grow unless the relative humidity exceeds 60%. Relative humidity also affects the rate of offgassing of formaldehyde from indoor building materials, the rate of formation of acids and salts from sulfur and nitrogen dioxide, and the rate of formation of ozone. The influence of relative humidity on the abundance of allergens, pathogens, and noxious chemicals suggests that indoor relative humidity levels should be considered as a factor of indoor air quality. The majority of adverse health effects caused by relative humidity would be minimized by maintaining indoor levels between 40 and 60%. This would require humidification during winter in areas with cold winter climates. Humidification should preferably use evaporative or steam humidifiers, as cool mist humidifiers can disseminate aerosols contaminated with allergens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schaffer, F. L., Soergel, M. E., & Straube, D. C. (1976) · Archives of Virology · doi:10.1007/bf01317930 · Cited by 302
Cited by
Adverse Health Effects Among Adults Exposed to Home Dampness and Molds
Dales, R. E., Burnett, R., & Zwanenburg, H. (1991) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/143.3.505 · Cited by 295
Health effects of indoor-air microorganisms
Husman, T. (1996) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.103 · Cited by 289
Making the Case for “Whole System” Approaches: Integrating Public Health and Housing
Sharpe, R. A., Taylor, T., Fleming, L. E., Morrissey, K., Morris, G., & Wigglesworth, R. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15112345 · Cited by 63
Scottish Passive House: Insights into Environmental Conditions in Monitored Passive Houses
Foster, J., Sharpe, T., Poston, A., Morgan, C., & Musau, F. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8050412 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Arundel, A. V., Sterling, E. M., Biggin, J. H., & Sterling, T. D.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 351-361
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2036352238
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indirect health effects of relative humidity in indoor environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.8665351
- The paper
- Arundel, A. V., Sterling, E. M., Biggin, J. H., & Sterling, T. D. (1986). Indirect health effects of relative humidity in indoor environments. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8665351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.