The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vivo Assessment of Arsenic Bioavailability in Rice and Its Significance for Human Health Risk Assessment
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Millions of people worldwide consume arsenic-contaminated rice; however, little is known about the uptake and bioavailability of arsenic species after arsenic-contaminated rice ingestion. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we assessed arsenic speciation in greenhouse-grown and supermarket-bought rice, and determined arsenic bioavailability in cooked rice using an in vivo swine model. RESULTS: In supermarket-bought rice, arsenic was present entirely in the inorganic form compared to greenhouse-grown rice (using irrigation water contaminated with sodium arsenate), where most (approximately 86%) arsenic was present as dimethylarsinic acid (organic arsenic). Because of the low absolute bioavailability of dimethylarsinic acid and the high proportion of dimethylarsinic acid in greenhouse-grown rice, only 33 +/- 3% (mean +/- SD) of the total rice-bound arsenic was bioavailable. Conversely, in supermarket-bought rice cooked in water contaminated with sodium arsenate, arsenic was present entirely in the inorganic form, and bioavailability was high (89 +/- 9%). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that arsenic bioavailability in rice is highly dependent on arsenic speciation, which in turn can vary depending on rice cultivar, arsenic in irrigation water, and the presence and nature of arsenic speciation in cooking water. Arsenic speciation and bioavailability are therefore critical parameters for reducing uncertainties when estimating exposure from the consumption of rice grown and cooked using arsenic-contaminated water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geographical Variation in Total and Inorganic Arsenic Content of Polished (White) Rice
Meharg, A. A., Williams, P. N., Adomako, E., Lawgali, Y. Y., Deacon, C., Villada, A., Cambell, R. C. J., Sun, G., Zhu, Y.-G., Feldmann, J., et al. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es802612a · Cited by 772
Molin, M., Ulven, S. M., Meltzer, H. M., & Alexander, J. (2015) · Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtemb.2015.01.010 · Cited by 229
Moreda-Piñeiro, J., Moreda-Piñeiro, A., Romarís-Hortas, V., Moscoso-Pérez, C., López-Mahía, P., Muniategui-Lorenzo, S., Bermejo-Barrera, P., & Prada-Rodríguez, D. (2011) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2010.09.008 · Cited by 182
Arsenic in Foodchain and Community Health Risk: A Study in Gangetic West Bengal
Santra, S. C., Samal, A. C., Bhattacharya, P., Banerjee, S., Biswas, A., & Majumdar, J. (2013) · Procedia Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2013.04.002 · Cited by 172
The occurrences of heavy metals in farmland soils and their propagation into paddy plants
Rahman, M. S., Biswas, P. K., Al Hasan, S. M., Rahman, M. M., Lee, S. H., Kim, K.-H., Rahman, S. M., & Islam, M. R. (2018) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-018-6577-7 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Juhasz, A. L., Smith, E., Weber, J., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuchel, T., Sansom, L., & Naidu, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1826-1831
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2154223973
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Assessment of Arsenic Bioavailability in Rice and Its Significance for Human Health Risk Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.9322
- The paper
- Juhasz, A. L., Smith, E., Weber, J., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuchel, T., Sansom, L., & Naidu, R. (2006). In Vivo Assessment of Arsenic Bioavailability in Rice and Its Significance for Human Health Risk Assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.