Cited by 39Heavy metals in environmentHeavy Metals in PlantsWater Quality and Pollution Assessment

The occurrences of heavy metals in farmland soils and their propagation into paddy plants

Rahman, Md. Shahedur, Biswas, Polsh Kumar, Al Hasan, Syed Mahfuz, Rahman, Mohammad Mahfuzur, Lee, S. H., Kim, Ki-Hyun, Rahman, Shaikh Mizanur, Islam, Md. Rezuanul·2018·Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Abstract

In this research, heavy metal accumulation pattern was investigated using the data measured from the soil, paddy plants, and irrigation water samples in Jessore district in Bangladesh with the aid of principal component analysis. A total of 28 samples representing farmland soil and irrigation water along with paddy plant were collected from 28 locations in the Jessore district in November 2016. In agricultural soil, arsenic (As) and nickel (Ni) were found 2.78 and 1.11 times more concentrated than their background values. In addition, 89% of the sample sites exhibited enhanced As concentrations relative to the background value. Principal component analysis (PCA) of soil data showed strong homogeneity in many species (e.g., Ni, Cu, Fe, and As) to reflect intense agricultural activities. In contrast, Pb showed no such homogeneity in soil accumulation pattern. In plant samples, Cu, Fe, and As were strongly correlated and homologous. This homology of pollution was in agreement with the pollution homology in the agricultural soil in which the plants were grown. In irrigation water, Cu and Ni were homologous. Observation of spatial distribution and other variables indicated that the accumulation of any particular metal in paddy plants was correlated with its content in soil and irrigation water, which was influenced by the soil organic matter, soil/water pH, and other metals present in that environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10661-018-6577-7

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahman, M. S., Biswas, P. K., Al Hasan, S. M., Rahman, M. M., Lee, S. H., Kim, K.-H., Rahman, S. M., & Islam, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Jashore University of Science and Technology (BD)
  • Keimyung University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Islamic University (BD)
Corresponding author
  • Rahman, Mohammad Mahfuzur
  • Kim, Ki-Hyun
  • Rahman, Shaikh Mizanur
  • Islam, Md. Rezuanul
Venue
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Published
2018-03-08
Volume
190
Issue
4
Pages
201-201
ISSN
  • 0167-6369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2959
OpenAlex
W2791681267
Cited by
39
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Keywords
heavy metals, agricultural soils, arsenic, nickel, copper, lead, irrigation water, metal accumulation, soil organic matter, soil pH, Jessore district
MeSH terms
Farms, Arsenic, Bangladesh, China, Copper, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollution, Iron, Lead, Nickel, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Metals, Heavy, Principal Component Analysis, Groundwater, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review