The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhalation Exposure Study of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles with a Primary Particle Size of 2 to 5 nm
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Nanotechnology offers great promise in many industrial applications. However, little is known about the health effects of manufactured nanoparticles, the building blocks of nanomaterials. OBJECTIVES: Titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) nanoparticles with a primary size of 2-5 nm have not been studied previously in inhalation exposure models and represent some of the smallest manufactured nanoparticles. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity of these nanoparticles using a murine model of lung inflammation and injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The properties of TiO(2) nanoparticles as well as the characteristics of aerosols of these particles were evaluated. Mice were exposed to TiO(2) nanoparticles in a whole-body exposure chamber acutely (4 hr) or subacutely (4 hr/day for 10 days). Toxicity in exposed mice was assessed by enumeration of total and differential cells, determination of total protein, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity and inflammatory cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Lungs were also evaluated for histopathologic changes RESULTS: Mice exposed acutely to 0.77 or 7.22 mg/m(3) nanoparticles demonstrated minimal lung toxicity or inflammation. Mice exposed subacutely (8.88 mg/m(3)) and necropsied immediately and at week 1 or 2 postexposure had higher counts of total cells and alveolar macrophages in the BAL fluid compared with sentinels. However, mice recovered by week 3 postexposure. Other indicators were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Mice subacutely exposed to 2-5 nm TiO(2) nanoparticles showed a significant but moderate inflammatory response among animals at week 0, 1, or 2 after exposure that resolved by week 3 postexposure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bermudez, E., Mangum, J. B., Wong, B. A., Asgharian, B., Hext, P. M., Warheit, D. B., & Everitt, J. I. (2004) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh019 · Cited by 652
Cited by
Airborne microplastics: consequences to human health?
Prata, J. C. (2018) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.043 · Cited by 1,852
Liu, H., Wang, C., Li, C., Qin, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, F., Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2018) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra13510f · Cited by 915
Nanotechnology in cosmetics: Opportunities and challenges
Raj, S., Jose, S., Sumod, U., & Sabitha, M. (2012) · Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences · doi:10.4103/0975-7406.99016 · Cited by 545
Nanotechnology: Advantages and drawbacks in the field of construction and building materials
Pacheco-Torgal, F., & Jalali, S. (2011) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.009 · Cited by 528
Potential Health Impact of Nanoparticles
Xia, T., Li, N., & Nel, A. E. (2009) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100155 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Grassian, V. H., O’Shaughnessy, P. T., Adamcakova-Dodd, A., Pettibone, J. M., & Thorne, P. S.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 397-402
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2013132865
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhalation Exposure Study of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles with a Primary Particle Size of 2 to 5 nm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.9469
- The paper
- Grassian, V. H., O’Shaughnessy, P. T., Adamcakova-Dodd, A., Pettibone, J. M., & Thorne, P. S. (2007). Inhalation Exposure Study of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles with a Primary Particle Size of 2 to 5 nm. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9469
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.