The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproductive effects in birds exposed to pesticides and industrial chemicals.
Open accessAbstract
Environmental contamination by agricultural chemicals and industrial waste disposal results in adverse effects on reproduction of exposed birds. The diversity of pollutants results in physiological effects at several levels, including direct effects on breeding adults as well as developmental effects on embryos. The effects on embryos include mortality or reduced hatchability, failure of chicks to thrive (wasting syndrome), and teratological effects producing skeletal abnormalities and impaired differentiation of the reproductive and nervous systems through mechanisms of hormonal mimicking of estrogens. The range of chemical effects on adult birds covers acute mortality, sublethal stress, reduced fertility, suppression of egg formation, eggshell thinning, and impaired incubation and chick rearing behaviors. The types of pollutants shown to cause reproductive effects include organochlorine pesticides and industrial pollutants, organophosphate pesticides, petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and in a fewer number of reports, herbicides, and fungicides. o,p'-DDT, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and mixtures of organochlorines have been identified as environmental estrogens affecting populations of gulls breeding in polluted "hot spots" in southern California, the Great Lakes, and Puget Sound. Estrogenic organochlorines represent an important class of toxicants to birds because differentiation of the avian reproductive system is estrogen dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ohlendorf, H. M., Hoffman, D. J., Saiki, M. K., & Aldrich, T. W. (1986) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/0048-9697(86)90104-x · Cited by 600
Cited by
Jayaraj, R., Megha, P., & Sreedev, P. (2016) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.1515/intox-2016-0012 · Cited by 1,171
Wildlife Ecotoxicology of Pesticides: Can We Track Effects to the Population Level and Beyond?
Köhler, H.-R., & Triebskorn, R. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1237591 · Cited by 911
Vos, J. G., Dybing, E., Greim, H. A., Ladefoged, O., Lambré, C., Tarazona, J. V., Brandt, I., & Vethaak, A. D. (2000) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440091159176 · Cited by 832
Rochman, C. M., Kurobe, T., Flores, I., & Teh, S. J. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.051 · Cited by 759
Matthews, J. B., Twomey, K., & Zacharewski, T. R. (2001) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx0001833 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Fry, D. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- suppl 7
- Pages
- 165-171
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2129726738
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive effects in birds exposed to pesticides and industrial chemicals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.95103s7165
- The paper
- Fry, D. M. (1995). Reproductive effects in birds exposed to pesticides and industrial chemicals. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.95103s7165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.