The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of a recombinant yeast cell estrogen screening assay.
Open accessAbstract
A wide range of chemicals with diverse structures derived from plant and environmental origins are reported to have hormonal activity. The potential for appreciable exposure of humans to such substances prompts the need to develop sensitive screening methods to quantitate and evaluate the risk to the public. Yeast cells transformed with plasmids encoding the human estrogen receptor and an estrogen responsive promoter linked to a reporter gene were evaluated for screening compounds for estrogenic activity. Relative sensitivity to estrogens was evaluated by reference to 17 beta-estradiol (E2) calibration curves derived using the recombinant yeast cells, MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, and a prepubertal mouse uterotrophic bioassay. The recombinant yeast cell bioassay (RCBA) was approximately two and five orders of magnitude more sensitive to E2 than MCF-7 cells and the uterotrophic assay, respectively. The estrogenic potency of 53 chemicals, including steroid hormones, synthetic estrogens, environmental pollutants, and phytoestrogens, was measured using the RCBA. Potency values produced with the RCBA relative to E2 (100) included estrone (9.6), diethylstilbestrol (74.3), tamoxifen (0.0047), alpha-zearalanol (1.3), equol (0.085), 4-nonylphenol (0.005), and butylbenzyl phathalate (0.0004), which were similar to literature values but generally higher than those produced by the uterotrophic assay. Exquisite sensitivity, absence of test compound biotransformation, ease of use, and the possibility of measuring antiestrogenic activity are important attributes that argue for the suitability of the RCBA in screening for potential xenoestrogens to evaluate risk to humans, wildlife, and the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An updated review of environmental estrogen and androgen mimics and antagonists
Sonnenschein, C., & Soto, A. M. (1998) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-0760(98)00027-2 · Cited by 990
Several environmental oestrogens are also anti-androgens
Sohoni, P., & Sumpter, J. (1998) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/joe.0.1580327 · Cited by 856
Blair, R. M. (2000) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/54.1.138 · Cited by 806
Matthews, J. B., Twomey, K., & Zacharewski, T. R. (2001) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx0001833 · Cited by 465
Campbell, C. G., Borglin, S. E., Green, F. B., Grayson, A., Wozei, E., & Stringfellow, W. T. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.08.003 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Coldham, N. G., Dave, M., Sivapathasundaram, S., McDonnell, D. P., Connor, C., & Sauer, M. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 734-742
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2035794967
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of a recombinant yeast cell estrogen screening assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.97105734
- The paper
- Coldham, N. G., Dave, M., Sivapathasundaram, S., McDonnell, D. P., Connor, C., & Sauer, M. J. (1997). Evaluation of a recombinant yeast cell estrogen screening assay. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.97105734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.