The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid screening of environmental chemicals for estrogen receptor binding capacity.
Open accessAbstract
Over the last few years, an increased awareness of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and their potential to affect wildlife and humans has produced a demand for practical screening methods to identify endocrine activity in a wide range of environmental and industrial chemicals. While it is clear that in vivo methods will be required to identify adverse effects produced by these chemicals, in vitro assays can define particular mechanisms of action and have the potential to be employed as rapid and low-cost screens for use in large scale EDC screening programs. Traditional estrogen receptor (ER) binding assays are useful for characterizing a chemical's potential to be an estrogen-acting EDC, but they involve displacement of a radioactive ligand from crude receptor preparations at low temperatures. The usefulness of these assays for realistically determining the ER binding interactions of weakly estrogenic environmental and industrial compounds that have low aqueous solubility is unclear. In this report, we present a novel fluorescence polarization (FP) method that measures the capacity of a competitor chemical to displace a high affinity fluorescent ligand from purified, recombinant human ER-[alpha] at room temperature. The ER-[alpha] binding interactions generated for 15 natural and synthetic compounds were found to be similar to those determined with traditional receptor binding assays. We also discuss the potential to employ this FP technology to binding studies involving ER-ss and other receptors. Thus, the assay introduced in this study is a nonradioactive receptor binding method that shows promise as a high throughput screening method for large-scale testing of environmental and industrial chemicals for ER binding interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Male Reproductive Health and Environmental Xenoestrogens
Toppari, J., Larsen, J. C., Christiansen, P., Giwercman, A., Grandjean, P., Guillette, L. J., Jegou, B., Jensen, T. K., Jouannet, P., Keiding, N., et al. (1996) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.2307/3432709 · Cited by 348
Structure and Function of the Estrogen Receptor
PARKER, M. G., ARBUCKLE, N., DAUVOIS, S., DANIELIAN, P., & WHITE, R. (1993) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb32276.x · Cited by 129
Cited by
Estrogen receptors: how do they signal and what are their targets
Heldring, N., Pike, A., Andersson, S., Matthews, J., Cheng, G., Hartman, J., Tujague, M., Ström, A., Treuter, E., Warner, M., et al. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00026.2006 · Cited by 1,857
Blair, R. M. (2000) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/54.1.138 · Cited by 806
High-throughput and ultra-high-throughput screening: solution- and cell-based approaches
Sundberg, S. (2000) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(99)00051-8 · Cited by 455
Role of estrogen receptors in health and disease
Chen, P., Li, B., & Ou-Yang, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.839005 · Cited by 339
Shutoh, Y., Takeda, M., Ohtsuka, R., Haishima, A., Yamaguchi, S., Fujie, H., Komatsu, Y., Maita, K., & Harada, T. (2009) · The Journal of Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.2131/jts.34.469 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolger, R., Wiese, T. E., Ervin, K., Nestich, S., & Checovich, W.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 551-557
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2042124938
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.