The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ranking Cancer Risks of Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants in the United States
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In this study we compared cancer risks from organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) based on total personal exposure summed across different microenvironments and exposure pathways. METHODS: We developed distributions of personal exposure concentrations using field monitoring and modeling data for inhalation and, where relevant, ingestion pathways. We calculated risks for a nonoccupationally exposed and nonsmoking population using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) unit risks. We determined the contribution to risk from indoor versus outdoor sources using indoor/outdoor ratios for gaseous compounds and the infiltration factor for particle-bound compounds. RESULTS: With OEHHA's unit risks, the highest ranking compounds based on the population median are 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde, benzene, and dioxin, with risks on the order of 10(-4)-10(-5). The highest risk compounds with the U.S. EPA unit risks were dioxin, benzene, formaldehyde, and chloroform, with risks on a similar order of magnitude. Although indoor exposures are responsible for nearly 70% of risk using OEHHA's unit risks, when infiltration is accounted for, inhalation of outdoor sources contributed 50% to total risk, on average. Additionally, 15% of risk resulted from exposures through food, mainly due to dioxin. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, benzene, acetaldehyde, and 1,3-butadiene risk came from outdoor sources, whereas indoor sources were primarily responsible for chloroform, formaldehyde, and naphthalene risks. The infiltration of outdoor pollution into buildings, emissions from indoor sources, and uptake through food are all important to consider in reducing overall personal risk to HAPs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
KLEPEIS, N. E., NELSON, W. C., OTT, W. R., ROBINSON, J. P., TSANG, A. M., SWITZER, P., BEHAR, J. V., HERN, S. C., & ENGELMANN, W. H. (2001) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165 · Cited by 4,803
Chloroform Mode of Action: Implications for Cancer Risk Assessment
Golden, R. J., Holm, S. E., Robinson, D. E., Julkunen, P. H., & Reese, E. A. (1997) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/rtph.1997.1161 · Cited by 76
Measured Concentrations of VOCs in Several Non-Residential Microenvironments in the United States
Loh, M. M., Houseman, E. A., Gray, G. M., Levy, J. I., Spengler, J. D., & Bennett, D. H. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es060197g · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Cited by
Formaldehyde in the Indoor Environment
Salthammer, T., Mentese, S., & Marutzky, R. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800399g · Cited by 1,808
Sarigiannis, D. A., Karakitsios, S. P., Gotti, A., Liakos, I. L., & Katsoyiannis, A. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.005 · Cited by 522
Non-cancer, cancer, and dermal sensitization risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetics
Lim, D. S., Roh, T. H., Kim, M. K., Kwon, Y. C., Choi, S. M., Kwack, S. J., Kim, K. B., Yoon, S., Kim, H. S., & Lee, B.-M. (2018) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A · doi:10.1080/15287394.2018.1451191 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Loh, M. M., Levy, J. I., Spengler, J. D., Houseman, E. A., & Bennett, D. H.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1160-1168
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2035931328
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ranking Cancer Risks of Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.9884
- The paper
- Loh, M. M., Levy, J. I., Spengler, J. D., Houseman, E. A., & Bennett, D. H. (2007). Ranking Cancer Risks of Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants in the United States. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.