Cited by 59Air Quality and Health ImpactsCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionPlant responses to elevated CO2

Long-term exposure to ambient ozone and progression of subclinical arterial disease: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis and air pollution

Open access
Wang, Meng, Sampson, Paul D., Sheppard, Lianne E., Stein, James H., Vedal, Sverre, Kaufman, Joel D.·2019·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term ozone ([Formula: see text]) exposure is associated with cardiovascular mortality, but little is known about the associations between [Formula: see text] and subclinical arterial disease. OBJECTIVES: We studied the longitudinal association of exposure to [Formula: see text] and progression of key subclinical arterial markers in adults: intima-media thickness of common carotid artery ([Formula: see text]), carotid plaque (CP) burden, and coronary artery calcification (CAC). METHODS: CAC was measured one to four times at baseline and at follow-up exams (1999–2012) by computed tomography (CT) in 6,619 healthy adults, recruited at age 45-84 y without cardiovascular disease (CVD), over a mean of 6.5 y (standard deviation: 3.5 y). [Formula: see text] and CP burden were quantified in 3,392 participants using carotid artery ultrasound imaging acquired over a mean of 9 y (1.7 y). Over 91% and 89% participants had at least one follow-up [Formula: see text] and CAC measurement, respectively. Residence-specific [Formula: see text] concentrations were estimated by a validated spatiotemporal model spanning from 1999 to 2012. This model relied on comprehensive monitoring data and geographical variables to predict individualized long-term average concentrations since baseline. Linear mixed models and logistic regression model were used to evaluate relationships of long-term average exposure to [Formula: see text] with longitudinal change in [Formula: see text], CAC, and CP formation, respectively. RESULTS: Mean progression rates of [Formula: see text] and CAC were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. CP formation was identified in 55% of the subjects. A [Formula: see text] increase in long-term average [Formula: see text] exposure was associated with a [Formula: see text] [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4, 9.7] greater increase in [Formula: see text] over 10 y. A [Formula: see text] increase in [Formula: see text] was also associated with new CP formation [odds ratio (OR): 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.4)] but not CAC progression [[Formula: see text] (95% CI: [Formula: see text], 2)]. Associations were robust in the analysis with extended covariate adjustment, including copollutants, i.e., nitrogen oxides ([Formula: see text]) and particulate matter with diameter [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSION: Over almost a decade of follow-up, outdoor [Formula: see text] concentrations were associated with increased rate of carotid wall thickness progression and risk of new plaque formation, suggesting arterial injury in this cohort. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3325.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp3325

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased ambient ozone exposure was associated with increased rate of carotid wall thickness progression and risk of new plaque formation in healthy adults.

    “Wang et al. found that increased ambient ozone exposure was associated with increased rate of carotid wall thickness progression and risk of new plaque formation in healthy adults (52).”

    From Ozone pollution: A Major health hazard worldwide (2019) · cites this paper as [52]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 59

Authors
Wang, M., Sampson, P. D., Sheppard, L. E., Stein, J. H., Vedal, S., & Kaufman, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Meng
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2019-05-01
Volume
127
Issue
5
Pages
57001-57001
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2944120434
Cited by
59
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95167, RD83479601, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95168, RD831697, N01-HC-95161, UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, RD83479601-01, RD‐83830001, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95169)
  • University of Washington (P30ES07033)
  • National Institutes of Health (N01-HC- 95166, N01-HC9-5168, N01-HC- 95159, UL1TR001079, UL1TR000040, RD831697, UL1-TR-, N01‐HC‐95161, N01- HC-95163, N01- HC-95165, N01‐HC‐95160, N01 HC95164, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC95162, N01‐HC‐95169, and N01-HC-95169)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01 HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, UL1-TR-000040 and UL1-TR-001079, N01 HC-95168, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, and N01-HC-95169, N01 HC95167, (N01-HC-95163, N01 HC-95161, N01 HC95165, N01HC95164, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01‐HC‐95166, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, RD831697, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, and N01-HC-95169, N01 HC-95162, N01 HC95169)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (K24ES013195, P30ES007033)
  • National Center for Research Resources (N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95168, N01-HC-95160, N01 HC 95169, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01 HC 95161, RD831697, UL1-TR-000040 and UL1-TR-001079, N01-HC-95159, N01 HC 95165, N01-HC-95167)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
Keywords
ambient ozone, atherosclerosis, carotid plaque, coronary artery calcification, intima-media thickness, air pollution exposure, cardiovascular risk, long-term exposure
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Air Pollutants, Cities, Environmental Exposure, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ozone, Prospective Studies, United States, Incidence, Prevalence, Disease Progression, Atherosclerosis, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review