Reallocating Cancer Surgery Payments for Alternate Level of Care in Ontario: What Are the Options?
Open accessAbstract
This article examines how alternate-level-of-care (ALC) days are funded through the cancer surgery funding model in Ontario and evaluates policy options to better address ALC days. The contribution of ALC days to hospital funding and the impact of removing or reallocating this funding from cancer surgery is measured. Though costs associated with ALC days in cancer surgery are low, this article highlights the need for policy options that would realign funding across the healthcare system in Ontario to better meet the needs of patients waiting for ALC, reduce pressure on inpatient bed capacity and improve value for money.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only one published study, Wong et al. (2020), had estimated the average cost of ALC bed-days in Canada.
“I identified only one published study, Wong et al. (2020), that estimated the average cost of ALC bed-days in Canada.”
From Estimating the Cost of Alternate Level of Care When It Is Inextricably Linked to the Cost of Acute Care: A Canadian Example (2026) · cites this paper as Wong et al. (2020)
The Discussion reports $829 per ALC day for Ontario colorectal cancer surgery, but identifies this as a QBP funding amount, not the average cost of ALC bed-days across Canada. The Introduction cites Sutherland et al. (2019) for a separate estimated cost of C$1,090 per ALC bed-day. Whether Wong et al. was the only published study identified is the citing author's own assessment, not a finding this source establishes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDuring fiscal year 2015-16, colorectal cancer surgery funded by Quality-Based Procedures cost Cancer Care Ontario $829 per ALC day, or approximately $2 million annually.
“According to Wong et al. (2020), during the fiscal year 2015-16, colorectal cancer surgery funded by Quality-Based Procedures (QBPs) cost Cancer Care Ontario $829 per ALC day, or ∼$2 million annually.”
From Estimating the Cost of Alternate Level of Care When It Is Inextricably Linked to the Cost of Acute Care: A Canadian Example (2026) · cites this paper as Wong et al. 2020
The Wong et al. funding allocation was based on 4.3% of QBP patient days being designated as ALC, which is significantly lower than the provincial average of 13.9% of all inpatient days.
“This funding allocation was based on 4.3% of QBP patient days being designated as ALC, which is significantly lower than the provincial average of 13.9% of all inpatient days.”
From Estimating the Cost of Alternate Level of Care When It Is Inextricably Linked to the Cost of Acute Care: A Canadian Example (2026) · cites this paper as Wong et al. 2020
The Wong et al. (2020) study was based on a very small subset of Ontario's inpatient population.
“However, the study was based on a very small subset of Ontario's inpatient population.”
From Estimating the Cost of Alternate Level of Care When It Is Inextricably Linked to the Cost of Acute Care: A Canadian Example (2026) · cites this paper as Wong et al. (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Costa, A., & Hirdes, J. (2010) · Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2010.21899 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Seniors and Alternative Level of Care: Building on Our Knowledge
Jutan, N., Langlois, L., & Damiano, N. (2013) · Healthcare Quarterly · doi:10.12927/hcq.2013.23503 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Afilalo M. Xue X. Soucy N. Colacone A. Jourdenais E. Boivin J.-F.. 2014. Patient Needs, Required Level of Care, and Reasons Delaying Hospital Discharge for Nonacute Patients Occupying Acute Hospital Beds. Journal for Healthcare Quality 39(4): 200– 10. 10.1111/jhq.12076. 28658090 · DOI
- Baker G.R. Norton P.G. Flintoft V. Blais R. Brown A. Cox J. et al. 2004. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: The Incidence of Adverse Events among Hospital Patients in Canada. CMAJ 170(11): 1678– 86. 10.1503/CMAJ.1040498. 15159366 PMC408508 · DOI
- Bayar B. Yılmaz K.B. Akıncı M. Şahin A. Kulaçoğlu H.. 2016. An Evaluation of Treatment Results of Emergency versus Elective Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Turkish Journal of Surgery 32(1): 11– 17. 10.5152/UCD.2015.2969. 26985154 PMC4771420 · DOI
- Bender D. Holyoke P.. 2018. Why Some Patients Who Do Not Need Hospitalization Cannot Leave: A Case Study of Reviews in 6 Canadian Hospitals. Healthcare Management Forum 31(4): 121– 25. 10.1177/0840470418755408. 29390888 PMC6041730 · DOI
- Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). 2012. DAD Abstracting Manual 2011–2012 Edition. Authors.
- Cressman G. Ploeg J. Kirkpatrick H. Kaasalainen S. McAiney C.. 2013. Uncertainty and Alternate Level of Care: A Narrative Study of the Older Patient and Family Caregiver Experience. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 45(4): 12– 29. 10.1177/084456211304500403. 24617277 · DOI
- Desai N.R. Ross J.S. Kwon J.Y. Herrin J. Dharmarajan K. Bernheim S.M. et al. 2016. Association between Hospital Penalty Status under the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program and Readmission Rates for Target and Nontarget Conditions. JAMA 316(24): 2647– 56. 10.1001/jama.2016.18533. 28027367 PMC5599851 · DOI
- Kristensen S.R. Bech M. Quentin W.. 2014. A Roadmap for Comparing Readmission Policies with Application to Denmark, England, Germany and the United States. Health Policy 119(3): 264– 73. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.12.009. 25547401 · DOI
- Kuluski K. Im J. McGeown M.. 2017. “It's a Waiting Game” A Qualitative Study of the Experience of Carers of Patients Who Require an Alternate Level of Care. BMC Health Services Research 17(1): 318. 10.1186/s12913-017-2272-6. 28464878 PMC5414131 · DOI · Paper page
- Landeiro F. Roberts K. Gray A.M. Leal J.. 2017. Delayed Hospital Discharges of Older Patients: A Systematic Review on Prevalence and Costs. The Gerontologist 59(2): e86– 97. 10.1093/geront/gnx028. 28535285 · DOI
- Manville M. Klein M.C. Bainbridge L.. 2014. Improved Outcomes for Elderly Patients Who Received Care on a Transitional Care Unit. Canadian Family Physician 60(5): e263– 71. 24829021 PMC4020664
- McCloskey R. Jarrett P. Stewart C. Nicholson P.. 2014. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Hospitals: What Does Dementia Have to Do with This? Canadian Geriatrics Journal 17(3): 88– 94. 10.5770/cgj.17.106. 25232367 PMC4164681 · DOI · Paper page
- McCloskey R. Jarrett P. Stewart C.. 2015. The Untold Story of Being Designated an Alternate Level of Care Patient. Healthcare Policy 11(1): 76– 89. 10.12927/hcpol.2015.24364. 26571470 PMC4748367 · DOI · Paper page
- Palmer K.S. Brown A.D. Evans J.M. Marani H. Russell K.K. Martin D. et al. 2018. Qualitative Analysis of the Dynamics of Policy Design and Implementation in Hospital Funding Reform. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0191996. 10.1371/journal.pone.0191996. 29373587 PMC5786323 · DOI
- Sutherland J. Liu G. Crump T. Blair M. Karimuddin A.. 2019. Relationship between Pre-Operative Patient-Reported Outcomes and Hospital Length of Stay: A Prospective Cohort Study of General Surgery Patients in Vancouver, Canada. Health Services Research and Policy 24(1): 29– 36. 10.1177/1355819618791634. 30103632 · DOI
- Sutherland J.M. Crump R.T.. 2013. Alternative Level of Care: Canada's Hospital Beds, the Evidence and Options. Healthcare Policy 9(1): 26– 34. 10.12927/hcpol.2013.23480. PMC3999549 23968671 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson D.M. Vihos J. Hewitt J.A. Barnes N. Peterson K. Magnus R.. 2013. Examining Waiting Placement in Hospital: Utilization and the Lived Experience. Global Journal of Health Science 6(2): 12– 22. 10.5539/gjhs.v6n2p12. 24576361 PMC4825473 · DOI
- Zuckerman R.B. Sheingold S.H. Orav E.J. Ruhter J. Epstein A.M.. 2016. Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. New England Journal of Medicine 374(16): 1543– 51. 10.1056/NEJMsa1513024. 26910198 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Basu, K. (2026) · Hospital Topics · doi:10.1080/00185868.2025.2474761 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“According to Wong et al. (2020), during the fiscal year 2015–16, colorectal cancer surgery funded by Quality-Based Procedures (QBPs) cost Cancer Care Ontario $829 per ALC day, or ∼ $2 million annually.”
- Authors
- Wong, J., Milroy, S., Sun, K., Iorio, P., Seto, M., Monakova, J., & Sutherland, J.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Care Ontario (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- ORCID
- Sutherland, Jason
- Venue
- Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé
- Publisher
- Longwoods Publishing
- Published
- 2020-11-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 41-54
- ISSN
- 1715-6572 (ISSN-L)
- 1715-6580
- PMC
- PMC7710964
- OpenAlex
- W3107015929
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Healthcare policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Care Ontario
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- alternate level of care, cancer surgery, hospital finance, health care financing, waiting time, hospital bed capacity, value for money, Ontario health policy
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Female, Financing, Government, Patient Care, Health Policy, Hospitals, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Neoplasms, Ontario, Patient Discharge, Health Care Costs, Subacute Care, Healthcare Financing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review