Cited by 3Health Services Management and PolicyHealthcare Systems and PracticesHealthcare Policy and Management

Reallocating Cancer Surgery Payments for Alternate Level of Care in Ontario: What Are the Options?

Open access
Wong, Judith, Milroy, Shannon, Sun, Katherine, Iorio, Pierre, Seto, May, Monakova, Julia, Sutherland, Jason·2020·Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé

Abstract

This article examines how alternate-level-of-care (ALC) days are funded through the cancer surgery funding model in Ontario and evaluates policy options to better address ALC days. The contribution of ALC days to hospital funding and the impact of removing or reallocating this funding from cancer surgery is measured. Though costs associated with ALC days in cancer surgery are low, this article highlights the need for policy options that would realign funding across the healthcare system in Ontario to better meet the needs of patients waiting for ALC, reduce pressure on inpatient bed capacity and improve value for money.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26354

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Afilalo M. Xue X. Soucy N. Colacone A. Jourdenais E. Boivin J.-F.. 2014. Patient Needs, Required Level of Care, and Reasons Delaying Hospital Discharge for Nonacute Patients Occupying Acute Hospital Beds. Journal for Healthcare Quality 39(4): 200– 10. 10.1111/jhq.12076. 28658090 · DOI
  2. Baker G.R. Norton P.G. Flintoft V. Blais R. Brown A. Cox J. et al. 2004. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: The Incidence of Adverse Events among Hospital Patients in Canada. CMAJ 170(11): 1678– 86. 10.1503/CMAJ.1040498. 15159366 PMC408508 · DOI
  3. Bayar B. Yılmaz K.B. Akıncı M. Şahin A. Kulaçoğlu H.. 2016. An Evaluation of Treatment Results of Emergency versus Elective Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Turkish Journal of Surgery 32(1): 11– 17. 10.5152/UCD.2015.2969. 26985154 PMC4771420 · DOI
  4. Bender D. Holyoke P.. 2018. Why Some Patients Who Do Not Need Hospitalization Cannot Leave: A Case Study of Reviews in 6 Canadian Hospitals. Healthcare Management Forum 31(4): 121– 25. 10.1177/0840470418755408. 29390888 PMC6041730 · DOI
  5. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). 2012. DAD Abstracting Manual 2011–2012 Edition. Authors.
  6. Cressman G. Ploeg J. Kirkpatrick H. Kaasalainen S. McAiney C.. 2013. Uncertainty and Alternate Level of Care: A Narrative Study of the Older Patient and Family Caregiver Experience. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 45(4): 12– 29. 10.1177/084456211304500403. 24617277 · DOI
  7. Desai N.R. Ross J.S. Kwon J.Y. Herrin J. Dharmarajan K. Bernheim S.M. et al. 2016. Association between Hospital Penalty Status under the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program and Readmission Rates for Target and Nontarget Conditions. JAMA 316(24): 2647– 56. 10.1001/jama.2016.18533. 28027367 PMC5599851 · DOI
  8. Kristensen S.R. Bech M. Quentin W.. 2014. A Roadmap for Comparing Readmission Policies with Application to Denmark, England, Germany and the United States. Health Policy 119(3): 264– 73. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.12.009. 25547401 · DOI
  9. Kuluski K. Im J. McGeown M.. 2017. “It's a Waiting Game” A Qualitative Study of the Experience of Carers of Patients Who Require an Alternate Level of Care. BMC Health Services Research 17(1): 318. 10.1186/s12913-017-2272-6. 28464878 PMC5414131 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Landeiro F. Roberts K. Gray A.M. Leal J.. 2017. Delayed Hospital Discharges of Older Patients: A Systematic Review on Prevalence and Costs. The Gerontologist 59(2): e86– 97. 10.1093/geront/gnx028. 28535285 · DOI
  11. Manville M. Klein M.C. Bainbridge L.. 2014. Improved Outcomes for Elderly Patients Who Received Care on a Transitional Care Unit. Canadian Family Physician 60(5): e263– 71. 24829021 PMC4020664
  12. McCloskey R. Jarrett P. Stewart C. Nicholson P.. 2014. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Hospitals: What Does Dementia Have to Do with This? Canadian Geriatrics Journal 17(3): 88– 94. 10.5770/cgj.17.106. 25232367 PMC4164681 · DOI · Paper page
  13. McCloskey R. Jarrett P. Stewart C.. 2015. The Untold Story of Being Designated an Alternate Level of Care Patient. Healthcare Policy 11(1): 76– 89. 10.12927/hcpol.2015.24364. 26571470 PMC4748367 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Palmer K.S. Brown A.D. Evans J.M. Marani H. Russell K.K. Martin D. et al. 2018. Qualitative Analysis of the Dynamics of Policy Design and Implementation in Hospital Funding Reform. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0191996. 10.1371/journal.pone.0191996. 29373587 PMC5786323 · DOI
  15. Sutherland J. Liu G. Crump T. Blair M. Karimuddin A.. 2019. Relationship between Pre-Operative Patient-Reported Outcomes and Hospital Length of Stay: A Prospective Cohort Study of General Surgery Patients in Vancouver, Canada. Health Services Research and Policy 24(1): 29– 36. 10.1177/1355819618791634. 30103632 · DOI
  16. Sutherland J.M. Crump R.T.. 2013. Alternative Level of Care: Canada's Hospital Beds, the Evidence and Options. Healthcare Policy 9(1): 26– 34. 10.12927/hcpol.2013.23480. PMC3999549 23968671 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wilson D.M. Vihos J. Hewitt J.A. Barnes N. Peterson K. Magnus R.. 2013. Examining Waiting Placement in Hospital: Utilization and the Lived Experience. Global Journal of Health Science 6(2): 12– 22. 10.5539/gjhs.v6n2p12. 24576361 PMC4825473 · DOI
  18. Zuckerman R.B. Sheingold S.H. Orav E.J. Ruhter J. Epstein A.M.. 2016. Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. New England Journal of Medicine 374(16): 1543– 51. 10.1056/NEJMsa1513024. 26910198 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, J., Milroy, S., Sun, K., Iorio, P., Seto, M., Monakova, J., & Sutherland, J.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Care Ontario (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé
Published
2020-11-10
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
41-54
ISSN
  • 1715-6572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-6580
OpenAlex
W3107015929
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Care Ontario
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
alternate level of care, cancer surgery, hospital finance, health care financing, waiting time, hospital bed capacity, value for money, Ontario health policy
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Female, Financing, Government, Patient Care, Health Policy, Hospitals, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Neoplasms, Ontario, Patient Discharge, Health Care Costs, Subacute Care, Healthcare Financing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review