Cited by 6Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Legal Procedures on Hospital Length of Stay: Balancing Legal and Clinical Concerns

Open access
Shin, Jinah, San Gabriel, Maria Chona P., Ho-Periola, Agnes, Ramer, Sheryl, Kwon, Youngihn, Bang, Heejung·2022·Journal of Korean Academy of psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Purpose: Psychiatric hospital length of stay (LOS) is not affected solely by socio-clinical factors but also by legal procedures. This study examined the associations between legal procedures and LOS.Methods: Data from 521 patients with psychiatric illnesses hospitalized over 2013-2015 were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictors of longer (> 14 days) or prolonged (> 30) LOS with socio-clinical factors and legal procedures including court-ordered interventions (assisted outpatient treatment, medication over objection, and retention).Results: Longer LOS occurred in 246 patients and 99 had prolonged LOS. Legal procedures affected 57 patients, with 11 assisted outpatient treatments, 39 cases of medication over objection, and 16 retentions. Longer LOS was significantly associated with six factors including older age, unmarried status, non-Hispanic race, risk of violence, schizophrenia, and legal procedures. Legal procedures had the strongest association. Longer/prolonged LOS yielded qualitatively similar associations.Conclusion: Among 521 psychiatric inpatients, approximately 11% were mandated to receive interventions/procedures by the courts. Court-ordered legal procedures were strongly associated with longer LOS. Mental health providers may consider legal procedures for patients at high treatment/ medication noncompliance risk as early as patient admission to inpatient units to prevent, intervene or prepare for a longer or prolonged LOS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12934/jkpmhn.2022.31.2.181

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two papers examining perceived coercion found that involuntary admission was more likely to lead to differences in perceived coercion between patients and their families.

    “Two papers examining perceived coercion found that involuntary admission was more likely to lead to differences in perceived coercion between patients and their families (21,126).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [126]

    The Methods describe a medical-record review, and the Results and Conclusion address court procedures and hospital length of stay, not perceived coercion. Searches for coercion and for patient–family differences after involuntary admission found no passage addressing the claimed finding. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Swartz, 2016, Resource document on involuntary outpatient commitment and related programs of assisted outpatient treatment [Internet]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shin, J., San Gabriel, M. C. P., Ho-Periola, A., Ramer, S., Kwon, Y., & Bang, H.
Affiliations
  • Insilicogen (South Korea) (KR)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Shin, Jinah
Venue
Journal of Korean Academy of psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Published
2022-06-30
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
181-191
ISSN
  • 1225-8482 (ISSN-L)
  • 2288-4653
OpenAlex
W4283715824
Cited by
6
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR001860)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
assisted outpatient treatment, involuntary psychiatric hospitalization, prolonged hospital stay, medication non-adherence, treatment non-adherence, schizophrenia, violence risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review