Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping

Herzog, Harold A.·2014·Animal Behavior and Cognition

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12966/abc.08.06.2014

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Changes in the relative frequency of the word 'pet' in books printed in the United States between 1800 and 2000.
Figure 1 Changes in the relative frequency of the word 'pet' in books printed in the United States between 1800 and 2000.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Archer, J. (2011). Pet keeping: A case study in maladaptive behavior. In C. A. Salmon and T. K. Shackelford (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 281-296). New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Bentley, R. A., Hahn, M. W., & Shennan, S. J. (2004). Random drift and culture change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B -Biological Sciences, 271, 1443-1450
  3. Berger, J., & Le Mens, G. (2009). How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8146-8150.
  4. Boesch, C., & Boesch, H. (1989). Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Tai National Park. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78, 547-573.
  5. Coppinger, R., & Coppinger, L. (2002). Dogs: A new understanding of canine origin, behavior, and evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Diamond, J. (1993). New Guineans and their natural world. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.) The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 251-271). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  7. Erikson, P. (2000). The social significance of pet-keeping among Amazonian Indians. In A. Podberscek, E. S. Paul, & J. A Serpell (Eds.) Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp. 7-26). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Ghirlanda, S., Acerbi, A., & Herzog, H. (in press). A case study in media influence on choice: Dog movie stars and dog breed popularity. PloS ONE.
  9. Gillum, R. F., & Obisesan, T. O. (2010). Living with companion animals, physical activity and mortality in a US national cohort. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 2452-2459.
  10. Glocker, M. L., Langleben, D. D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J. W., Valdez, J. N., Griffin, M. D., … Gur, R. C. (2009). Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 9115-9119.
  11. Grier, K. C. (2006). Pets in America: A history. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press.
  12. Guthrie, S. (1995). Faces in the clouds. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Hahn, M. W., & Bentley, R. A. (2003). Drift as a mechanism for cultural change: An example from baby names. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, S120-S123.
  14. Hatkoff, I., Hatkoff, C., & Kahumbu, D. P. (2006). Owen and Mzee. New York: Scholastic Press.
  15. Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). How can I connect with thee: Measuring and comparing satisfaction in multiple relationship domains. Journal of Individual Psychology, 66, 43-67.
  16. Headey, B. & Grabka, M. (2011). Health correlates of pet ownership from national surveys. In P. McCardle, S. McCune, J. A. Griffin, & V. Maholmes (Eds.), How animals affect us: Examining the influences of human- animal interaction on child development and human health. (pp. 153-162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  17. Herzog, H. A., Bentley, R. A., & Hahn, M. W. (2004). Random drift and large shifts in popularity of dog breeds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, S353-S356.
  18. Herzog, H. A., & Elias, S. M. (2004). Effects of winning the Westminster Kennel Club dog show on breed popularity. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 225, 365-367.
  19. Hirata, S., Yamakoshi, G., Fujita, S., Ohashi, G., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001). Capturing and toying with hyraxes (Dendrohyrax dorsalis) by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) at Bossou, Guinea. American Journal of Primatology, 53, 93-97.
  20. Hsu, Y., & Serpell, J. A. (2003). Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring behavior and temperament traits in pet dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 223, 1293-1300.
  21. Izar, P., Verderane, M. P., Visalberghi, E., Ottoni, E. B., Gomes De Oliveira, M., Shirley, J., & Fragaszy, D. (2006). Cross-genus adoption of a marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) by wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus): Case report. American Journal of Primatology, 68, 692-700.
  22. Knobel, D. L., Laurenson, M. K., Kazwala, R. R., Boden, L. A., & Cleaveland, S. (2008). A cross-sectional study of factors associated with dog ownership in Tanzania. BMC Veterinary Research, 4, 1-10. doi: 10.1186/1746- 6148-4-5. · DOI
  23. Laurent, E. (2000). Children, "insects," and play in Japan. In A. Podberscek, E. S. Paul, & J. A Serpell (Eds.) Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp. 90-107). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Lieberson, S. (2000). A matter of taste: How names, fashions, and culture change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  25. LoBue, V. (2010). And along came a spider: Superior detection of spiders in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 59-66.
  26. LoBue, V., Bloom Pickard, M., Sherman, K., Axford, C., & DeLoache, J. S. (2013). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 57-69.
  27. Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  28. Müllersdorf, M., Granström, F., Sahlqvist, L., & Tillgren, P. (2010). Aspects of health, physical/leisure activities, work and socio-demographics associated with pet ownership in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38, 53-63.
  29. New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16598-16603.
  30. Patronek, G. J., Slater, M., & Marder, A. (2010). Use of a number-needed-to-ban calculation to illustrate limitations of breed-specific legislation in decreasing the risk of dog bite-related injury. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 237, 788-792.
  31. Serpell, J. A. (1989). Pet-keeping and animal domestication: A reappraisal. In J. Clutton-Brock (Ed.) The walking larder: Patterns of domestication, pastorialism and predation (pp. 10-21). London: Unwin Hyman.
  32. Serpell, J. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human-animal relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Serpell, J. A., & Paul, E. S. (2011). Pets in the family: An evolutionary perspective. In C. A. Salmon and T. K. Shackelford (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 298-309). New York: Oxford University Press.
  34. Thomas, K. (1984). Man and the natural world: Changing attitudes in England 1500-1800. London: Penguin.
  35. Tifferet, S., Kruger, D. J., Bar-Lev, O., & Zeller, S. (2013). Dog ownership increases attractiveness and attenuates perceptions of short-term mating strategy in cad-like men. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 121- 129.
  36. Torrey, E. F., & Yolken, R. H. (2005). Beasts of the earth: Animals, humans, and disease. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  37. Wells, D. L. (2009). The effects of animals on human health and well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 523-543.
  38. Westgarth, C., Heron, J., Ness, A. R., Bundred, P., Gaskell, R. M., Coyne, K. P., … Dawson, S. (2010). Family pet ownership during childhood: Findings from a UK birth cohort and implications for public health research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 3704-3729.
  39. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  40. Wilson, E. O. (1993). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.) The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 31-41). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Herzog, H. A.
Venue
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Published
2014
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
296
ISSN
2372-4323
Cited by
45
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review