The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is continuity of carer a top priority for all women?
Abstract
This project aimed to measure local progress toward selected Changing Childbirth indicators using a client questionnaire. From responses given, it appears that knowing a named carer throughout pregnancy and childbirth is not the top priority for all women. For respondents, it was more important to have good quality care from all health professionals. In conclusion, the Changing Childbirth indicators should not be audited in the same way as objective standards. It is important to consider women's own interpretation of whether services were satisfactory, in addition to ascertaining what these services were.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These findings are in keeping with many of the RCTs [4–6, 14], other studies [4, 6, 8–14], and the Cochrane review of midwife-led care [7].”
Citations
Cites
Women's experience of transfer from community-based to consultant-based maternity care
Creasy, J. M. (1997) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/s0266-6138(97)90030-9 · Cited by 33
Community midwives' and general practitioners' perspectives, of antenatal care in the community
Battersby, S., & Thomson, A. M. (1997) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/s0266-6138(97)90062-0 · Cited by 13
Do you have to know your midwife?
Stewart, M. (1995) · British Journal of Midwifery · doi:10.12968/bjom.1995.3.1.19 · Cited by 4
Knowledge of and preference for the DOMINO delivery option
Wardle, S. A., Wright, P. J., & Court, B. V. (1997) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/s0266-6138(97)90006-1 · Cited by 3
The demise of the traditional community midwife
Smith, M. (1997) · British Journal of Midwifery · doi:10.12968/bjom.1997.5.5.252 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Department of Health, 1993, London
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forster, D. A., McLachlan, H. L., Davey, M.-A., Biro, M. A., Farrell, T., Gold, L., Flood, M., Shafiei, T., & Waldenström, U. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0798-y · Cited by 251
Changing Childbirth: a pilot project
Hicks, C., Spurgeon, P., & Barwell, F. (2003) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02665.x · Cited by 30
Continuity of carer and partnership
Freeman, L. M. (2006) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2006.05.002 · Cited by 30
Spurgeon, P., Hicks, C., & Barwell, F. (2001) · Midwifery · doi:10.1054/midw.2001.0255 · Cited by 43
Forster, D. A., McKay, H. A., Davey, M., Small, R. E., Cullinane, F., Newton, M. S., Powell, R. L., & McLachlan, H. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Fellowes, D., Horsley, A., & Rochefort, J.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Lewisham (GB)
- Development Unit
- Venue
- British Journal of Midwifery
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-40
- ISSN
- 0969-4900 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-4307
- OpenAlex
- W1988903463
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Midwifery (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- continuity of carer, client satisfaction, quality of care, midwifery, obstetric care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
