Cited by 19Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and EducationMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Pregnant women's knowledge about the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus: A qualitative study

Poth, Megan, Carolan, Mary·2013·British Journal of Midwifery

Abstract

Background: Rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been steadily increasing over the last two decades ( Ferrara, 2007 ). A diagnosis of GDM has major implications for a woman's pregnancy and care management. At the same time, a healthy lifestyle and diet may significantly reduce the risk of GDM in pregnancy. Aim: This study explores the ‘knowledge’ of at-risk pregnant women about the role of lifestyle and diet in the prevention of GDM. Setting: A large hospital that provides secondary-level medical care as well as having a large midwifery group practice in Australia. Methods: The methodology used for this study is qualitative and was informed by phenomenology. A purposive sample of six women over 30 years old participated in a conversational interview using an interview guide. Results: Transcripts were analysed thematically and four broad themes emerged from the study: knowledge of GDM; effect of GDM on mother and baby; diet and exercise as part of a healthy lifestyle; and prevention of GDM. These findings indicated a range of gaps in the women's understanding of how lifestyle and diet can reduce the risk of GDM. Gaps included misconceptions about the cause of GDM, an incomplete understanding of lifestyle risk factors, limited awareness of the effect GDM has on mother and baby, incomplete knowledge of a healthy diet, inconsistent views of recommended physical activity and frequency, and limited understanding of GDM preventative measures. Conclusion: The lack of dietary and lifestyle knowledge demonstrated in this study may suggest that women need more appropriate health information on diet and exercise during their antenatal care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.10.692

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite the well-documented impact of factors such as diet, physical activity, micronutrient intake, age and family history on GDM risk, little is known about how women perceive and act upon these risks prior to pregnancy.

    “Despite the well‐documented impact of factors such as diet, physical activity, micronutrient intake, age and family history on GDM risk, little is known about how women perceive and act upon these risks prior to pregnancy [29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poth, M., & Carolan, M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
  • Victoria University (AU)
Venue
British Journal of Midwifery
Published
2013-10
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
692-700
ISSN
  • 0969-4900 (ISSN-L)
  • 2052-4307
OpenAlex
W2088860483
Cited by
18
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, prevention, pregnant women's knowledge, diet, lifestyle, physical activity, prenatal care, health information, misconceptions, maternal and fetal outcomes, midwifery practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review