The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quasi-experimeiftal research designs
Abstract
In complex naturally occurring health-care situations, it is often difficult, and sometimes impossible, for ethical and/or practical reasons to meet the requirements of manipulation and control needed in true and ideal group experiments. If researchers wish to investigate causal relationships in such circumstances then quasi-experimental designs are recommended. The designs represent approximations of true experiments because they do not meet all the necessary requirements, such as random allocation of subjects to groups, control and manipulation. Consequently, quasi-experimental designs are not as powerful as true experimental designs in establishing causal relationships but nevertheless allow such relationships to be considered by a process of rejecting rival hypotheses. This article outlines the two main approaches to quasi-experimental designs and provides an example of each. Other methods related to the quasi-experiment are also highlighted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quasi-experiments are appropriate for practical situations and ethical compliance for studies involving vulnerable participants such as older adults, and allow scholars to conduct rigorous studies under certain limitations and non-control conditions.
“Quasiexperiments are appropriate for practical situations and ethical compliance for studies involving vulnerable participants such as older adults, 17 and allow scholars to conduct rigorous studies under certain limitations and non-control conditions. 18”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Burns, 1993, believe that time
- Burns N, 1993, C ritique ana U tilisation
- Christensen LB, 1988, Experimental Methodology
- C am pbell D T (1979) Q u a si- non-equivalent E x
- Liebert RM, 1986, Science and Behaviour: An Introduction to M ethods o f time-series design
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dino, M. J. S., Dion, K. W., Abadir, P. M., Budhathoki, C., Huang, C.-M., Ong, I., Vital, J. C., Cotter, V. T., Himmelfarb, C. R. D., & Davidson, P. M. (2024) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/14604582241267793 · Cited by 5
“16 Quasi-experiments are appropriate for practical situations and ethical compliance for studies involving vulnerable participants such as older adults, 17 and allow scholars to conduct rigorous studies under certain limitations and non-control conditions.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Behi, R., & Nolan, M.
- Affiliations
- Bangor University (GB)
- Northern General Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- British Journal of Nursing
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 1996-09-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1079-1081
- ISSN
- 0966-0461 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-2819
- OpenAlex
- W2098205818
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- quasi-experimental design, causal inference, health care research, research ethics
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Nursing Research, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review