Cited by 20Methodologies in Health Research and PracticeAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesHealth Policy Implementation Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quasi-experimeiftal research designs

Behi, Ruhi, Nolan, Mike·1996·British Journal of Nursing

Abstract

In complex naturally occurring health-care situations, it is often difficult, and sometimes impossible, for ethical and/or practical reasons to meet the requirements of manipulation and control needed in true and ideal group experiments. If researchers wish to investigate causal relationships in such circumstances then quasi-experimental designs are recommended. The designs represent approximations of true experiments because they do not meet all the necessary requirements, such as random allocation of subjects to groups, control and manipulation. Consequently, quasi-experimental designs are not as powerful as true experimental designs in establishing causal relationships but nevertheless allow such relationships to be considered by a process of rejecting rival hypotheses. This article outlines the two main approaches to quasi-experimental designs and provides an example of each. Other methods related to the quasi-experiment are also highlighted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12968/bjon.1996.5.17.1079

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Burns, 1993, believe that time
  2. Burns N, 1993, C ritique ana U tilisation
  3. Christensen LB, 1988, Experimental Methodology
  4. C am pbell D T (1979) Q u a si- non-equivalent E x
  5. Liebert RM, 1986, Science and Behaviour: An Introduction to M ethods o f time-series design

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Behi, R., & Nolan, M.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Northern General Hospital (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Nursing
Published
1996-09-26
Volume
5
Issue
17
Pages
1079-1081
ISSN
  • 0966-0461 (ISSN-L)
  • 2052-2819
OpenAlex
W2098205818
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
quasi-experimental design, causal inference, health care research, research ethics
MeSH terms
Humans, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Nursing Research, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review