Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is smoking a cause of erectile dysfunction? A literature review

Dorey, Grace·2001·British Journal of Nursing
DOI 10.12968/bjon.2001.10.7.5331
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction is common, and its prevalence increases with age owing to age-related diseases of vascular, hormonal, neurogenic and psychogenic factors. A literature review was undertaken to explore the impact of smoking on erectile dysfunction. The literature review of 18 studies revealed the detrimental effect of smoking on erectile function. Smokers were 1.5 times more likely to suffer erectile dysfunction than non-smokers. Men may be unaware of the effect of tobacco on erectile function. This literature review presents strong reasons for stopping smoking, and highlights the need for education within a comprehensive smoking cessation programme. All men should be offered smoking cessation treatment which includes nicotine replacement therapy and continued support. Randomized controlled trials are needed to explore the effect of smoking and smoking cessation on erectile dysfunction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12968/bjon.2001.10.7.5331

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Mannino, 1994, sought to determine
  2. Tan, 1999, investigated the possi
  3. Haddock, 1997, implemented
  4. Juenemann, 1987, found that dogs were
  5. Rosen, 1991, demonstrated that there
  6. Fletcher, 1982, concluded that
  7. Ajzen I, 1975, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research
  8. Butler RN, 1994, Geriatrics, 49, 27
  9. Coleman T, 2000, Br J Gen Practice, 50, 207
  10. Do H, 1992, London
  11. Do H, 1999, London
  12. Gonzales-Cadavid NF, 1999, Textbook of Erectile Dysfunction. Isis Medical Media
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1997.tb00801.x · DOI
  14. Kirby MG, 1999, Textbook of Erectile Dysfunction. Isis Medical Media
  15. Kirby R, 1999, Erectile Dysfunction: A Clinical Guide. Isis Medical Media
  16. Kirby R, 1999, Erectile Dysfunction: A Clinical Guide. Isis Medical Media
  17. Kosch SG, 1988, Fam Pract Res J, 7, 162
  18. Lewis R, 2000, Epidemiology and natural history of erectile dysfunction
  19. Lewis RW, 1999, Textbook of Erectile Dysfunction. Isis Medical Media
  20. Modebe O, 1990, African Journal of Medicine and Medical Science, 19, 259
  21. Moncada Iribarren I, 1999, Textbook of Erectile Dysfunction. Isis Medical Media
  22. Raw M, 1992, London
  23. Rosen R, 1999, Textbook of Erectile Dysfunction. Isis Medical Media
  24. Saenz de Tejada I, 1988, Am J Physiol 254 (Heart Circulation Physiology 23): H468-H472
  25. US Department of Health and Human Services, 1997, Dermatol Nurs, 9, 51
  26. Vidal Moreno JF, 1996, Actas Urol Espan, 20, 365

Cited by

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Dorey, G.
Affiliations
University of West of England, Bristol, and is Specialist Continence Physiotherapist at Somerset Nuffield Hospital, Taunton, and North Devon District Hospital NHS Trust, Barnstaple
Venue
British Journal of Nursing
Publisher
Mark Allen Group
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
455-465
ISSN
  • 0966-0461
  • 2052-2819
DOI
10.12968/bjon.2001.10.7.5331
Cited by
38
References
41
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.