The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Criteria for identifying wound infection
Abstract
Relying on traditional indicators of wound infection may cause delay in detection. The authors of this paper provide additional criteria that help identify infection in granulating wounds
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edwards, R., & Harding, K. G. (2004) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/00001432-200404000-00004 · Cited by 1,099
Self-citationThe validity of the clinical signs and symptoms used to identify localized chronic wound infection
Gardner, S. E., Frantz, R. A., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2001) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00178.x · Cited by 417
Silver dressings: their role in wound management
Leaper, D. J. (2006) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2006.00265.x · Cited by 414
Extending the TIME concept: what have we learned in the past 10 years?*
Leaper, D. J., Schultz, G., Carville, K., Fletcher, J., Swanson, T., & Drake, R. (2012) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2012.01097.x · Cited by 363
Psychological Factors and Delayed Healing in Chronic Wounds
Cole-King, A., & Harding, K. G. (2001) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200103000-00004 · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cutting, K. F., & Harding, K. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Wound Care
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 1994-06-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 198-201
- ISSN
- 0969-0700 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-2916
- OpenAlex
- W2560021129
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Criteria for identifying wound infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12968/jowc.1994.3.4.198
- The paper
- Cutting, K. F., & Harding, K. G. (1994). Criteria for identifying wound infection. Journal of Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.1994.3.4.198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
