Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical usage of honey as a wound dressing: an update

Open access
Molan, P., Betts, J.A.·2004·Journal of Wound Care

Abstract

Since Molan last covered this topic in Journal of Wound Care, there have been advances in the selection of honey for use in wound care, based on its antibacterial properties, and in clinical protocols for its use. This paper examines woundhealing results achieved with honey in the past fi ve years, the extent of its use and practical issues relating to its clinical use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.9.26708

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Molan, P., & Betts, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Wound Care
Published
2004-10
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
353-356
ISSN
  • 0969-0700 (ISSN-L)
  • 2052-2916
OpenAlex
W1979660821
Cited by
206
References
0
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical usage of honey as a wound dressing: an update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12968/jowc.2004.13.9.26708
The paper
Molan, P., & Betts, J. A. (2004). Clinical usage of honey as a wound dressing: an update. Journal of Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2004.13.9.26708

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.