The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survey of fungi and yeast in polymicrobial infections in chronic wounds
Abstract
Objective: To assess the incidence, abundance and species diversity of fungi in chronic wounds, as well as to describe the associations of major fungi populations. Method: Comprehensive molecular diagnostic reports were evaluated from a total of 915 chronic wounds in a retrospective study. Results: Of the 915 clinical specimens, 208 (23%) were positive for fungal species. These samples were further compared in a compiled dataset, and sub-classified among the four major chronic wound types (decubitus ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer, non-healing surgical wound, and venous leg ulcer). The most abundant fungi were yeasts in the genus Candida; however, Curvularia, Malessezia, Aureobasidium, Cladosporium, Ulocladium, Engodontium and Trichtophyton were also found to be prevalent components of these polymicrobial infections. A notable bacterial/fungal negative correlation was found to be apparent between Staphylococcus and Candida. There were also significant relationships between both bacterial and fungal genera and patient metadata including gender, diabetes status and cardiovascular comorbidities. Conclusion: This microbial survey shows that fungi are more important wound pathogens and opportunistic pathogens than previously reported, exemplifying the impact of these under-reported pathogens. With the application of modern cost-effective and comprehensive molecular diagnostics, clinicians can now identify and address this significant component of chronic wound bioburden with targeted therapies, thereby improving healing trajectories. Conflict of interest: SED and RW are owners of Pathogenius Diagnostics which is a clinical diagnostic laboratory, SED and RW are owners of Research and Testing Laboratory which develops molecular methods for clinical diagnostics. JK and CEJ are owners of SEMT which licenses lipogels for wound care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Chandra, J., Kuhn, D. M., Mukherjee, P. K., Hoyer, L. L., McCormick, T., & Ghannoum, M. A. (2001) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.183.18.5385-5394.2001 · Cited by 1,578
The Agent of Bacillary Angiomatosis: An Approach to the Identification of Uncultured Pathogens
Relman, D. A., Loutit, J. S., Schmidt, T. M., Falkow, S., & Tompkins, L. S. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199012063232301 · Cited by 901
Vermitsky, J.-P., & Edlind, T. D. (2004) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.48.10.3773-3781.2004 · Cited by 285
Biofilms and chronic infections
Wolcott, R. D. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.22.2682 · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Cited by
Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G., & Talbot, J. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59 · Cited by 721
The emerging world of the fungal microbiome
Huffnagle, G. B., & Noverr, M. C. (2013) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2013.04.002 · Cited by 567
Importance of Candida–bacterial polymicrobial biofilms in disease
Harriott, M. M., & Noverr, M. C. (2011) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.07.004 · Cited by 313
Kalan, L., Loesche, M., Hodkinson, B. P., Heilmann, K., Ruthel, G., Gardner, S. E., & Grice, E. A. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01058-16 · Cited by 246
Fungal biofilms in human health and disease
Ramage, G., Kean, R., Rautemaa-Richardson, R., Williams, C., & Lopez-Ribot, J. L. (2025) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-025-01147-0 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowd, S. E., Delton Hanson, J., Rees, E., Wolcott, R. D., Zischau, A. M., Sun, Y., White, J., Smith, D. M., Kennedy, J., & Jones, C. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Wound Care
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-47
- ISSN
- 0969-0700 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-2916
- OpenAlex
- W2099209347
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survey of fungi and yeast in polymicrobial infections in chronic wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12968/jowc.2011.20.1.40
- The paper
- Dowd, S. E., Delton Hanson, J., Rees, E., Wolcott, R. D., Zischau, A. M., Sun, Y., White, J., Smith, D. M., Kennedy, J., & Jones, C. E. (2011). Survey of fungi and yeast in polymicrobial infections in chronic wounds. Journal of Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2011.20.1.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.