Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Redefining the Chronic-Wound Microbiome: Fungal Communities Are Prevalent, Dynamic, and Associated with Delayed Healing

Kalan, Lindsay, Loesche, Michael, Hodkinson, Brendan P., Heilmann, Kristopher, Ruthel, Gordon, Gardner, Sue E., Grice, Elizabeth A.·2016·mBio

Abstract

Chronic nonhealing wounds have been heralded as a silent epidemic, causing significant morbidity and mortality especially in elderly, diabetic, and obese populations. Polymicrobial biofilms in the wound bed are hypothesized to disrupt the highly coordinated and sequential events of cutaneous healing. Both culture-dependent and -independent studies of the chronic-wound microbiome have almost exclusively focused on bacteria, omitting what we hypothesize are important fungal contributions to impaired healing and the development of complications. Here we show for the first time that fungal communities (the mycobiome) in chronic wounds are predictive of healing time, associated with poor outcomes, and form mixed fungal-bacterial biofilms. We longitudinally profiled 100, nonhealing diabetic-foot ulcers with high-throughput sequencing of the pan-fungal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) locus, estimating that up to 80% of wounds contain fungi, whereas cultures performed in parallel captured only 5% of colonized wounds. The “mycobiome” was highly heterogeneous over time and between subjects. Fungal diversity increased with antibiotic administration and onset of a clinical complication. The proportions of the phylum Ascomycota were significantly greater ( P = 0.015) at the beginning of the study in wounds that took >8 weeks to heal. Wound necrosis was distinctly associated with pathogenic fungal species, while taxa identified as allergenic filamentous fungi were associated with low levels of systemic inflammation. Directed culturing of wounds stably colonized by pathogens revealed that interkingdom biofilms formed between yeasts and coisolated bacteria. Combined, our analyses provide enhanced resolution of the mycobiome during impaired wound healing, its role in chronic disease, and impact on clinical outcomes. IMPORTANCE Wounds are an underappreciated but serious complication for a diverse spectrum of diseases. High-risk groups, such as persons with diabetes, have a 25% lifetime risk of developing a wound that can become chronic. The majority of microbiome research related to chronic wounds is focused on bacteria, but the association of fungi with clinical outcomes remains to be elucidated. Here we describe the dynamic fungal communities in 100 diabetic patients with foot ulcers. We found that communities are unstable over time, but at the first clinical presentation, the relative proportions of different phyla predict healing times. Pathogenic fungi not identified by culture reside in necrotic wounds and are associated with a poor prognosis. In wounds stably colonized by fungi, we identified yeasts capable of forming biofilms in concert with bacteria. Our findings illuminate the associations of the fungal mycobiome with wound prognosis and healing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.01058-16

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/dme.12545 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.009 · DOI
  4. Scott RD, II. 2009. The direct medical costs of health care-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Preparedness, Detection, and Control of Infectious Diseases, Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  5. 10.7547/0980489 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67698-2 · DOI
  7. 10.1089/wound.2014.0557 · DOI
  8. 10.3390/ijms13032535 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/gr.075549.107 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1171700 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.016 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00018-014-1812-z · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065288 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/cshperspect.a015362 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00292.x · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01493-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00747.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.tim.2013.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/978-1-4614-0106-3_4 · DOI
  20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109848 · DOI
  21. 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.8.43630 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00162.x · DOI
  23. 10.1186/gm467 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nri3684 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/AAC.00556-06 · DOI
  26. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01319 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/AAC.01647-12 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/JCM.01094-15 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s00248-012-0084-0 · DOI
  30. 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.1.40 · DOI
  31. 10.1128/JCM.02035-09 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.1117018109 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/mec.12481 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/2041-210X.12399 · DOI
  35. Bengtsson-Palme J, Ryberg M, Hartmann M, Branco S, Wang Z, Godhe A, De Wit P, Sánchez-García M, Ebersberger I, de Sousa F, Amend AS, Jumpponen A, Unterseher M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Bertrand YJK, Sanli K, Eriksson KM, Vik U, Veldre V, Nilsson RH. 2013. Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods Ecol Evol 9:914–919. · DOI
  36. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005614 · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054379 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S1130-1406(07)70027-X · DOI
  39. 10.1056/NEJMoa1213978 · DOI
  40. 10.1128/JCM.01482-15 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02379.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1164/rccm.200606-821OC · DOI
  43. 10.1128/IAI.72.9.4996-5003.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1128/IAI.73.1.30-38.2005 · DOI
  45. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1996.40309.x · DOI
  46. Gardner SE, Frantz RA, Hillis SL, Blodgett TJ, Femino LM, Lehman SM. 2012. Volume measures using a digital image analysis system are reliable in diabetic foot ulcers. Wounds 24:146–151.
  47. 10.3390/biology1030895 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1264/jsme2.ME14121 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · DOI · Paper page
  51. R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kalan, L., Loesche, M., Hodkinson, B. P., Heilmann, K., Ruthel, G., Gardner, S. E., & Grice, E. A.
Venue
mBio
Published
2016-11-02
Volume
7
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 2161-2129
  • 2150-7511
Cited by
246
References
13
Language
en
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (T32 AR007465)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R00 AR060873)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR R01NR009448, R01 NR015639)
  • NIAMS (R01 AR066663)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review