Cited by 55Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationWound Healing and TreatmentsGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

A pilot study on the potential of remote support to enhance wound care for nursing-home patients

Vowden, K., Vowden, P.·2013·Journal of Wound Care

Abstract

• Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of a Telehealth system, using digital pen-and-paper technology and a modifed smartphone, to remotely monitor and support the effectiveness of wound management in nursing home residents. • Method: A randomised controlled pilot study was conducted in selected nursing homes in bradford, which were randomised to either the control or evaluation group. All patients with a wound of any aetiology or severity, resident in the selected nursing homes were considered eligible to participate in the study. residents in the control homes who had, or developed, a wound during the study period, continued to receive unsupported care directed by the nursing home staff (defined as ‘standard care’), while those in the evaluation homes received standard care supported by input from the remote experts. • Results: thirty-nine patients with a wound were identified in the 16 participating bradford nursing homes. Analysis of individual patient management pathways suggested that the system provided improved patient outcomes and that it may offer cost savings by improving dressing product selection, decreasing inappropriate onward referral and speeding healing. Despite initial anxiety related to the technology most nursing-home staff found the system of value and many were keen to see the trial continue to form part of routine patient management. • Conclusion: the current study supports the potential value of telemedicine in wound care and indicates the value that such a system may have to nursing-home staff and patients. • Declaration of interest: this study was funded by a regional Innovation Fund grant from the Yorkshire and Humberside Strategic Health Authority. the authors have no conflict of interest to declare with respect to the article or its contents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.9.481

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of agreement (at least 80%) between experts have been reported for telewoundcare in nursing home settings.

    “High levels of agreement (at least 80%) between experts have been reported for this approach in primary care [28] and nursing home [29] settings.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vowden, K., & Vowden, P.
Affiliations
University of Bradford (GB)
Venue
Journal of Wound Care
Published
2013-09
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
481-488
ISSN
  • 0969-0700 (ISSN-L)
  • 2052-2916
OpenAlex
W2061188296
Cited by
55
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Wound Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
telemedicine, wound care, nursing home residents, remote wound monitoring, smartphones, wound dressing selection, wound healing, nursing home staff, cost reduction, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Pilot Projects, Skin Ulcer, Wounds and Injuries, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review