Cited by 8Semantic Web and OntologiesEducational Technology and AssessmentLibrary Science and Information Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

E-Assessment Data Compatibility Resolution Methodology with Bidirectional Data Transformation

Open access
Malik, Kaleem Razzaq, Ahmad, Tauqir·2017·EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Abstract

Electronic Assessment (E-Assessment) also known as computer aided assessment for the purposes involving diagnostic, formative or summative examining using data analysis. Digital assessments come commonly from social, academic, and adaptive learning in machine readable forms to deliver the machine scoring function. To achieve real-time and smart e-assessment, data modeling needs dramatic improvements at the level of representation which will improve examinees to gain prompt response instantly after attempting exams. Whereas, computer based inference to gain intelligence in assessing results through computations is becoming a useful feature in todays’ testing systems. Induction of rule base linked data is desired to be reformed from the old tradition data model found either in spread sheet or relational database used for data storage. These data forms are essential to be converted into semantical annotated form to support Artificial Intelligence. This can be done with the use of Semantic Web data model Resource Description Framework (RDF) built-up using hierarchal and linked data representation. Updating assessment source data later for results is one of the hardest problem of all viabilities in traditional and semantically augmented systems when combined for evaluating. This study purposes a methodology of bidirectional data transformation back and forth from Relational Database (RDB) and RDF. A case study representing qualitative analysis of transforming student’s results information into RDF store reforming data as ready to be analyzed. At the end of this study outcomes show how data updating becomes feasible by following proposed data transformation procedure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00767a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Malik, K. R., & Ahmad, T.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK)
Corresponding author
Malik, Kaleem Razzaq
Venue
EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Published
2017-06-19
Volume
13
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 1305-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1305-8223
OpenAlex
W2665286161
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
Keywords
digital assessment, computer-based testing, relational databases, Resource Description Framework, semantic web, RDF data model, data compatibility, data updating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-Assessment Data Compatibility Resolution Methodology with Bidirectional Data Transformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00767a
The paper
Malik, K. R., & Ahmad, T. (2017). E-Assessment Data Compatibility Resolution Methodology with Bidirectional Data Transformation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00767a