The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International Journal of Instruction
Open accessAbstract
The use of technology in higher education has become unavoidable. Between the “pivot” to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic and pressure from universities to integrate technology innovatively within courses, educators are increasingly turning to technology. In turn, all students are expected to engage successfully and rapidly with technology, irrespective of their level or background. It is therefore important to understand students’ attitudes and confidence towards technology, and how this drives their use, in order to keep students engaged. This study explores the factors that affect students’ use, attitudes and confidence with learning technologies. 11 volunteers from a UK university were interviewed about their experiences with technology. A thematic analysis was carried on the interviews, which found that there are a number of key factors underlying the participants’ attitude and confidence with technology. Students strongly considered the purpose and convenience of a technology before choosing whether to accept or reject it. Other factors included familiarity with particular technologies, and the use of an emerging universal iconic language, a new finding from this study. In addition, this study contributes five key recommendations surrounding competence, design and ownership which should be considered when educators are contemplating the use of technology in their higher education classrooms, whether online or face-to-face. It is important to think about these implications and how we as educators use these technologies going forward in a post-pandemic and technology-rich world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239516661713 · Cited by 967
Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis
Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C.-H., & Chang, C. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316628645 · Cited by 312
Chuang, H.-H. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9438-5 · Cited by 61
Barnyak, N. C., & McNelly, T. A. (2016) · Early Childhood Education Journal · doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0735-0 · Cited by 30
Košir, S., & Lakshminarayanan, R. (2023) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2022.2144626 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Venue
- International Journal of Instruction
- Publisher
- Modestum Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2018-12-21
- ISSN
- 1308-1470 (ISSN-L)
- 1694-609X
- DOI
- 10.12973/iji
- OpenAlex
- W4242131586
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Journal of Instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12973/iji
- The paper
- International Journal of Instruction. (2018). International Journal of Instruction. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.